File:Coast watch (1979) (20037564654).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (1,397 × 805 pixels, file size: 470 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
English:

Title: Coast watch
Identifier: coastwatch00uncs_14 (find matches)
Year: 1979 (1970s)
Authors: UNC Sea Grant College Program
Subjects: Marine resources; Oceanography; Coastal zone management; Coastal ecology
Publisher: (Raleigh, N. C. : UNC Sea Grant College Program)
Contributing Library: State Library of North Carolina
Digitizing Sponsor: North Carolina Digital Heritage Center

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
SEA SCIENCE once it's been damaged, he explains. In the case of oyster reef restoration, his FRG-funded study shows it's worth the effort. • OYSTER REEF RESTORATION The preferred substrate for reef restoration is oyster shell, most of which comes from the shucking industry, Marshall says. Shells from other bivalve mollusks, like clams or scallops, also can be used. Another alternative is marl — fossilized sedimentary rock that contains a substantial amount of calcium carbonate, a main ingredient in oyster shells. Marshall describes two methods used to rebuild oyster reefs. In shallow, tidal estuaries in the southern coastal region where the moon affects tides, reef material is sprayed off the decks of boats into areas marked off with pilings. In deeper, subtidal estuaries of the northern areas where tides are wind-driven, the material is dumped into piles with a front-end loader into areas marked off by buoys. Since the water is deeper, the reef materials can be mounded to taller elevations providing a habitat above areas that suffer from low dissolved-oxygen levels. Grabowski's study — along with those of Charles "Pete" Peterson and Hunter Lenihan of UNC-CH — is providing important data, according to Marshall, and can help determine the best sites for restoring reefs. • BUILDING REEFS Grabowski restored reefs in Middle Marsh, Carteret County, in three types of areas where oyster reefs tend to form naturally. These areas, or landscapes, are edges of salt marshes isolated from sea grass habitat, areas between salt marshes and sea grass beds, and mudflats away from vegetation. Shells and the use of shallow-draft barges for Grabowski's study were provided by DMF, with Marshall and Jeff French, also of the division, collaborating. "Though oyster reefs have only recently received recognition as a habitat to protect rather than a single-species resource to exploit, DMF has remained committed to assisting reef research and has been instrumental to the successful design and completion of several important restoration projects over the last 15 years," Grabowski points out. Also essential to the study was the fishing expertise of several members of the Saltwater Light Tackle Fishing Club. Grabowski notes that the club "has a real commitment to seeing habitat restored in order to enhance fisheries." Shortly after constructing the reefs in 1997, sampling began with fish traps, minnow pots, crab pots, gill nets and hook-and-line. Reefs and control areas — similar landscapes without reefs — were sampled to determine the benefits of restored reefs. Grabowski's study shows that the oyster is hardly "secret, self-contained and solitary," as Charles Dickens described it. Grabowski puts it scientifically. "A wide diversity of mobile animals utilized restored oyster reefs as juveniles or adults during the day and night throughout the year." It could be said that, for many aquatic animals, their world is an oyster reef. Or, perhaps, build it, and they will come. • THE BIO-DIVIDENDS What makes an oyster reef a hub of aquatic life is partly protection, but, just as likely, the oyster's place in the food chain. Tiny creatures such as boring sponges and various worms feed on oysters. And where small animals gather, larger ones will come. The study found white urchins, sea stars, right and lightening whelks, banded tulips, moon snails, grass shrimp, mud crabs and spider crabs in higher abundances on reefs than in controls. Fish found to frequent the reefs include our state saltwater fish, the red drum, along with flounder, speckled trout, gag grouper, snapper, blue fish, spottail pinfish, pigfish, toadfish and sheepshead.
Text Appearing After Image:
•W% ...

Note About Images

Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Date
Source

https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/20037564654/

Author Internet Archive Book Images
Permission
(Reusing this file)
At the time of upload, the image license was automatically confirmed using the Flickr API. For more information see Flickr API detail.
Flickr tags
InfoField
  • bookid:coastwatch00uncs_14
  • bookyear:1979
  • bookdecade:1970
  • bookcentury:1900
  • bookauthor:UNC_Sea_Grant_College_Program
  • booksubject:Marine_resources
  • booksubject:Oceanography
  • booksubject:Coastal_zone_management
  • booksubject:Coastal_ecology
  • bookpublisher:_Raleigh_N_C_UNC_Sea_Grant_College_Program_
  • bookcontributor:State_Library_of_North_Carolina
  • booksponsor:North_Carolina_Digital_Heritage_Center
  • bookleafnumber:65
  • bookcollection:statelibrarynorthcarolina
  • bookcollection:ncdhc
  • bookcollection:unclibraries
  • bookcollection:americana
  • BHL Collection
Flickr posted date
InfoField
17 August 2015

Licensing

[edit]
This image was taken from Flickr's The Commons. The uploading organization may have various reasons for determining that no known copyright restrictions exist, such as:
  1. The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired;
  2. The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions;
  3. The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or
  4. The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

More information can be found at https://flickr.com/commons/usage/.


Please add additional copyright tags to this image if more specific information about copyright status can be determined. See Commons:Licensing for more information.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Internet Archive Book Images at https://flickr.com/photos/126377022@N07/20037564654. It was reviewed on 21 September 2015 by FlickreviewR and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the No known copyright restrictions.

21 September 2015

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current05:07, 10 May 2016Thumbnail for version as of 05:07, 10 May 20161,397 × 805 (470 KB)Ruff tuff cream puff (talk | contribs)recrop
11:57, 9 May 2016Thumbnail for version as of 11:57, 9 May 20162,864 × 3,729 (1.42 MB)Faebot (talk | contribs)Uncrop
07:52, 21 September 2015Thumbnail for version as of 07:52, 21 September 20151,378 × 360 (117 KB) (talk | contribs)== {{int:filedesc}} == {{information |description={{en|1=<br> '''Title''': Coast watch<br> '''Identifier''': coastwatch00uncs_14 ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insource%3A%2Fcoa...

There are no pages that use this file.

Metadata