File:Chausath Yogini Mitawali Shiva Temple Madhya Pradesh 068.jpg
Original file (3,300 × 4,400 pixels, file size: 5.91 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionChausath Yogini Mitawali Shiva Temple Madhya Pradesh 068.jpg |
English: The Chausath Yogini temple at Mitaoli (Mitawali, Mitavali) is a circular hypaethral hilltop goddess-tradition Hindu temple near the Bateshwar site with about 200 Hindu temples and the Padhavali site with a profusely carved Shiva temple.
This circular Yogini temple is unusual when compared to other Chausath Yogini temples in India. Instead of 64 sanctum niches for 64 yoginis, it has 65 niches. Unlike all other niches here, the niche 37 is specially decorated with Hindu artwork. This suggests that this extra decorated niche was intentional and housed a special deity – probably also a goddess. The statues or aniconic symbols of the yoginis and special goddess are missing – probably destroyed or looted at some point of its history. Instead, some niches have Shiva linga – in a manner quite similar to the circular hypaethral temple in Kalna, West Bengal. Regional Hindus continued to visit and offers prayers, according to the earliest available scholarly mention of this temple. They refer to it as the Ekattatso Mahadeva Temple, rather than a Yogini temple. The outer walls of the outer 65-niche circular structure have small panels of amorous couples artwork. Most of these were beheaded and damaged in other ways, at some point in the history of this temple. Like other Chausath Yogini temple, the center of this circular temple has a pavilion. It is more elaborate here, larger with two concentric rings of pillars. At the very center is a Shiva shrine which is consistent with the spiritual literature of the Shaktism Hindu tradition. The significance of this temple to the historic Bateswar–Mitawali–Padhavali college-monasteries complex is unknown. The temple is architecturally and geometrically remarkable. According to an inscription found here, it was built in the 11th century by king Devapala of Kachhapaghata dynasty. Mitawali itself, however, is far more ancient site. Excavations near this hill in the 20th-century have yielded deliberately mutilated and also naturally eroded statues and artwork from the Kushana era (2nd to 3rd century). These discoveries have been moved to museums, in particular the Gwalior Fort museum. In late 20th-century, the physical resemblance of this temple with the Sansad – the Indian parliament building in Delhi, led many to believe that this temple inspired the Sansad. However, this in untrue and this temple was unknown to the architects of Sansad. |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Ms Sarah Welch |
Camera location | 26° 26′ 09.92″ N, 78° 14′ 05.81″ E | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 26.436089; 78.234947 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. | |
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.enCC0Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedicationfalsefalse |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:01, 2 December 2022 | 3,300 × 4,400 (5.91 MB) | Ms Sarah Welch (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | samsung |
---|---|
Camera model | SM-M317F |
Exposure time | 1/833 sec (0.0012004801920768) |
F-number | f/1.8 |
ISO speed rating | 25 |
Date and time of data generation | 10:42, 16 December 2021 |
Lens focal length | 5.23 mm |
Latitude | 26° 26′ 9.92″ N |
Longitude | 78° 14′ 5.81″ E |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 240 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 240 dpi |
Software used | Luminar AI |
File change date and time | 10:42, 16 December 2021 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 10:42, 16 December 2021 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX aperture | 1.69 |
APEX brightness | 19.63 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 1.69 APEX (f/1.8) |
Metering mode | Spot |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
DateTime subseconds | 000 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 000 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 000 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 24 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |