File:Carew & Kimberley Roads - Those little white lines -1.jpg
Original file (2,184 × 2,184 pixels, file size: 1.52 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionCarew & Kimberley Roads - Those little white lines -1.jpg |
English: These photos are part of a set - Check your CPZ lines. Those at the top and bottom-right show Carew Road N17. Bottom-left is Kimberley Road N17. I took them on 8 July 2008.
Photos in the set showed streets in Haringey - where I was then an elected councillor. Also streets elsewhere in London. (With one from Manchester.) They give information so people can decide whether or not to challenge Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs or 'parking tickets') where road markings were not compliant with the Statutory Regulations. Important: For an update in May 2009, please see below. ════════════════════════════════════ Meeting Neil Herron and Simon Aldridge On 17 June 2008, I met Neil Herron of Parking Appeals Ltd and Simon Aldridge of London Motorists' Action Group. Among other things, Neil and Simon explained something so straightforward and simple that I found it almost impossible to believe. The white lines* in the Controlled Parking Zone bays across the street from my home did not comply with Department for Transport regulations. "Are you certain", I asked. "Yes", they said. Which meant that a huge number of our local CPZ parking bays were non-compliant with the regulations. Could professional Highways contractors, a professional Highways Service, and a professional Parking Service all get it wrong? Well, it seems they can and they had. Not just in Haringey but in many local authorities across the country. Checking With The Department for Transport I wrote to the Department for Transport (DfT). They referred me to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002. And to the drawings in their Traffic Signs Manual. I looked at both and they confirmed what Neil and Simon said. ( See page 123 of the Manual; diagram 10.28 ) Street after street painted wrong? Surely not? (It's like someone tells me my trousers are on back-to-front.) So I wrote back to the DfT to check. Was this indeed correct? Was I looking at the right drawings? Yes, they said. Here's the simple rule. For CPZ parking bays like those in the photos above which do not have individually marked spaces for each vehicle the correct marking is a single broken white end line. The markings shown in these photos - a double broken white line at the end of a bay - must be used where there are individually marked-out spaces. Haringey Urban Environment Department - Bureauburble I also wrote to Haringey Urban Environment Department asking if they knew their CPZ lines were wrong. And, crucially, if wrongly painted, would motorists succeed if they 'made a representation' to Haringey or appealed after getting a parking ticket (PCN) ? In previous arguments about yellow box junctions in Philip Lane council officers in that Department had insisted on their 'good faith'. When it came to these white CPZ lines their initial reply was pure obfuscation. They wrote they were: " taking action to address errors in existing signing and lining throughout the borough". This would "involve remedial action if necessary". Also that: "members of the public have the right to appeal against any PCNs they have been issued. Those PCNs will be upheld where we consider that the markings and signs are clear and enforceable.". What did this weasel-worded bureauburble mean? It later turned out to be something like: 'We know full well that many of our CPZ parking bays are wrongly marked. But, you know what? We'll just carry on giving fines anyway. Most motorists won't know and won't object. Good faith? Hardly. Certainly and clarity? None at all. ______________________________________________ ( * The yellow lines seem to be properly marked, with the correct 'T'-bars at the ends.) |
Date | |
Source | https://www.flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/2686438139/ |
Author | Alan Stanton |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by Alan Stanton at https://flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/2686438139. It was reviewed on 23 December 2021 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
23 December 2021
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 08:19, 23 December 2021 | 2,184 × 2,184 (1.52 MB) | Oxyman (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Alan Stanton from https://www.flickr.com/photos/53921762@N00/2686438139/ with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot A640 |
Exposure time | 1/250 sec (0.004) |
F-number | f/4 |
Date and time of data generation | 17:33, 8 July 2008 |
Lens focal length | 7.3 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
File change date and time | 00:10, 21 July 2008 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 17:33, 8 July 2008 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 5 |
APEX shutter speed | 7.96875 |
APEX aperture | 4 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.96875 APEX (f/2.8) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 12,710.801393728 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 12,725.581395349 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Scene capture type | Landscape |