File:Brown Dog affair courtroom sketches.JPG
Brown_Dog_affair_courtroom_sketches.JPG (437 × 488 pixels, file size: 82 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]Description: Courtroom sketch during the Brown Dog libel trial, London, November 1903.
First publisher: The Daily Graphic, November 1903.
Author: Frank Gillett (1874–1927)
Source: Henderson, John (2005). A Life of Ernest Starling. Academic Press, p. 65. Henderson cites the Bayliss Papers, Library Services, University College London.
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
![]() |
This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929. |
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 05:15, 12 December 2013 | 437 × 488 (82 KB) | SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) | Description: Courtroom sketch during the Brown Dog libel trial, London, November 1903. First publisher: The ''Daily Graphic'', November 1903. Author: Frank Gillett (1874–1927) Source: Henderson, John (2005). ''A Life of Er... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on ko.wikipedia.org
- Usage on nl.wikipedia.org
- Usage on ru.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | Computer |
---|---|
Date and time of data generation | 20:37, 26 April 2012 |
Software used | Picasa |
File change date and time | 21:03, 26 April 2012 |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 20:37, 26 April 2012 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 54 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 54 |
Unique image ID | f497920314bce14653daa420d45c1ca0 |
IIM version | 4 |