File:Blackburn Roc (50096578168).jpg
Original file (6,000 × 4,000 pixels, file size: 15.14 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionBlackburn Roc (50096578168).jpg |
Model of a Blackburn Roc floatplane at the RAF Museum, Cosford, Shropshire, 8 July 2020. A serious contender for the worst aircraft ever to serve with the Fleet Air Arm. The whole concept was seriously flawed, combining the role of fleet fighter and dive bomber, which had two very different requirements. A dive bomber had to be a very sturdy aircraft, the extra weight not helping a high performing fighter. But even in the latter role, concentrating all the aircraft’s (rather puny) armament of four light machine guns in a rear turret (again adding weight) with no forward facing guns was the antithesis of what a fighter should be. The result was a very slow, cumbersome aircraft which wasn’t fast enough to catch enemy bombers let alone fighters. All the Roc could do was wait to be attacked. The flawed nature of the design was evident as soon as the first prototype flew in 1938 and the First Sea Lord wanted to cancel the project. Unfortunately, as Blackburn had a full order book and as new fighters were needed urgently, considerable effort had been made to switch production from Blackburn to Boulton Paul (which was producing the similarly armed Defiant ‘fighter’) and to cancel the programme would have been very disruptive. The outcome was predictable. The CO of the first FAA squadron to re-equip with the Roc pronounced that they were a ‘constant hindrance’ and requested they be replaced by Blackburn Skuas (Rocs without a turret), which says a lot when Skuas were poor fighters themselves. Nonetheless, in 1940 one Roc somehow managed to shoot down a Junkers Ju88 attacking a convoy off Belgium, an incredible, barely believable achievement. But quite quickly it was realised that the Rocs were not remotely combat-capable (and death traps to their gunners who just could not escape their turrets in a hurry) and they were re-assigned to air-sea-rescue duties and target towing. Perhaps the Roc’s most appropriate duties were performed by a few sent to Bermuda where they undertook anti-aircraft duties from the ground! Interestingly, the wheeled Roc’s were not the worst of the type. A prototype Roc floatplane was built in 1939 but the floats resulted in terrible handling (the Roc’s handling had never been more than adequate anyway) and a decrease in the already lamentable performance. Plans for a Roc floatplane squadron were immediately abandoned. |
Date | |
Source | Blackburn Roc |
Author | Hugh Llewelyn from Keynsham, UK |
Camera location | 52° 38′ 31.28″ N, 2° 18′ 33.08″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 52.642021; -2.309188 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
This image was originally posted to Flickr by hugh llewelyn at https://flickr.com/photos/58433307@N08/50096578168. It was reviewed on 11 July 2020 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-sa-2.0. |
11 July 2020
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:39, 11 July 2020 | 6,000 × 4,000 (15.14 MB) | Tm (talk | contribs) | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | NIKON CORPORATION |
---|---|
Camera model | NIKON D5300 |
Exposure time | 1/60 sec (0.016666666666667) |
F-number | f/4 |
ISO speed rating | 800 |
Date and time of data generation | 13:12, 8 July 2020 |
Lens focal length | 28 mm |
Horizontal resolution | 300 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 300 dpi |
Software used | Ver.1.01 |
File change date and time | 13:12, 8 July 2020 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Not defined |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 13:12, 8 July 2020 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.2645364064955 APEX (f/3.1) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
DateTime subseconds | 40 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 40 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 40 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Scene type | A directly photographed image |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 42 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Scene control | Low gain up |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |
Subject distance range | Unknown |
GPS tag version | 0.0.3.2 |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |