File:Bahnstrecke Neuwittenbek–Kiel Schusterkrug nahe Dreikronen.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 276 × 599 pixels. Other resolutions: 110 × 240 pixels | 221 × 480 pixels | 354 × 768 pixels | 472 × 1,024 pixels | 1,844 × 4,000 pixels.
Original file (1,844 × 4,000 pixels, file size: 3.96 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionBahnstrecke Neuwittenbek–Kiel Schusterkrug nahe Dreikronen.jpg |
Deutsch: Bahnstrecke Neuwittenbek–Kiel Schusterkrug nahe Dreikronen |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Christian Alexander Otto |
Camera location | 54° 23′ 47.02″ N, 10° 08′ 23.03″ E | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 54.396395; 10.139730 |
---|
Licensing
[edit]I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 19:45, 20 February 2021 | 1,844 × 4,000 (3.96 MB) | Christian aus Schleswig-Holstein (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | samsung |
---|---|
Camera model | SM-M215F |
Exposure time | 1/100 sec (0.01) |
F-number | f/2 |
ISO speed rating | 25 |
Date and time of data generation | 16:43, 18 February 2021 |
Lens focal length | 4.6 mm |
Latitude | 54° 23′ 47.02″ N |
Longitude | 10° 8′ 23.03″ E |
Width | 4,000 px |
Height | 1,844 px |
Orientation | Rotated 90° CCW |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | M215FXXU2BUAC |
File change date and time | 16:43, 18 February 2021 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Normal program |
Exif version | 2.2 |
Date and time of digitizing | 16:43, 18 February 2021 |
APEX shutter speed | 0.01 |
APEX aperture | 2 |
APEX brightness | 10.2 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2 APEX (f/2) |
Metering mode | Center weighted average |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
Color space | sRGB |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 25 mm |
Scene capture type | Standard |
Unique image ID | L48LLMF01PM |