File:Assessment-of-Metagenomic-Assembly-Using-Simulated-Next-Generation-Sequencing-Data-pone.0031386.g003.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Assessment-of-Metagenomic-Assembly-Using-Simulated-Next-Generation-Sequencing-Data-pone.0031386.g003.jpg (662 × 464 pixels, file size: 153 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionAssessment-of-Metagenomic-Assembly-Using-Simulated-Next-Generation-Sequencing-Data-pone.0031386.g003.jpg |
English: Scaffolds are constructed by linking contigs using information from paired end reads, during this process a number of unknown bases are usually found between the sequences of the linked contigs. To use the information obtained by scaffolding, Scaftigs can be constructed by extracting the contiguous sequences that lack unknown bases (Ns). a) Contig Length Distribution. Histograms of the contig lengths illustrate the number of contigs within a certain size fraction for assemblies of Illumina contigs (red) and Illumina scaftigs (light blue). Only contigs greater than 500 bp are shown, the x-axis is log scale. Assemblies were generated for different community complexities (10 genomes, 100 genomes, 400 genomes). b) Overall Accuracy of the Contigs. The overall accuracy of the contigs is summarized using different measures of chimericity. Bars to the left illustrate the percentage of all of the contigs that are chimeric, bars in the middle show the percentage of all of the contigs that have a Contig Score less than 95%, and to the right contigs that have a Contig Score less than 99%. Contig Score represents the percent identity between the contig and the derived reference genome. Illumina contigs are in red Illumina scaftigs are blue. c) Contig Accuracy across Contig Lengths. These combined strip plots show the degree of chimericity (upper plot) and contig score (lower plot) for each contig in the assemblies, each dot represents one contig. They are grouped into size bins. The degree of chimericity is the proportion of reads in a contig that are derived from the ‘wrong’ genome and thus make the contig chimeric. Contig Score represents the percent identity between the contig and the derived reference genome. Again Illumina contigs are in red and Illumina scaftigs are in blue. |
|
Date | ||
Source | Image file from Mende D, Waller A, Sunagawa S, Järvelin A, Chan M, Arumugam M, Raes J, Bork P (2012). "Assessment of Metagenomic Assembly Using Simulated Next Generation Sequencing Data". PLOS ONE. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0031386. PMID 22384016. PMC: 3285633. | |
Author | Mende D, Waller A, Sunagawa S, Järvelin A, Chan M, Arumugam M, Raes J, Bork P | |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
|
|
Provenance InfoField |
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 21:55, 11 October 2014 | 662 × 464 (153 KB) | Recitation-bot (talk | contribs) | Automatic upload of media from: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031386 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
IIM version | 2 |
---|