File:Arms of George Monck, 1st Duke of Albemarle, St Giles-in-the-Wood Church, Devon.jpg
![File:Arms of George Monck, 1st Duke of Albemarle, St Giles-in-the-Wood Church, Devon.jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Arms_of_George_Monck%2C_1st_Duke_of_Albemarle%2C_St_Giles-in-the-Wood_Church%2C_Devon.jpg/588px-Arms_of_George_Monck%2C_1st_Duke_of_Albemarle%2C_St_Giles-in-the-Wood_Church%2C_Devon.jpg?20140330182431)
Original file (1,497 × 1,527 pixels, file size: 1.67 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionArms of George Monck, 1st Duke of Albemarle, St Giles-in-the-Wood Church, Devon.jpg |
English: ![]() Heraldic escutcheon of General George Monck, 1st Duke of Albemarle (1608-1670), KG, of Potheridge in the parish of Merton, Devon. The whole circumscribed by the Garter, thus dated to after 1660 when he was created a Knight of the Garter on the Restoration of King Charles II. On external wall above the private doorway to the north transept Rolle Manorial Chapel of the parish church of St Giles-in-the-Wood, Devon, 3 miles north-east of Potheridge. Stone escutcheon sculpted in relief, quarterly of 4:
The arms of King Edward IV when Duke of York emphasise his descent from Lionel of Antwerp, 1st Duke of Clarence (1338–1368), third son of King Edward III (on which basis the House of York claimed the throne), who married Elizabeth de Burgh, 4th Countess of Ulster (1332–1363). Their daughter Philippa de Burgh married Edmund Mortimer, 3rd Earl of March, whose son Roger de Mortimer, 4th Earl of March, was the great-grandfather of King Edward IV; (Quarterly 1st: Arms of Edward IV; 2nd & 3rd: Or a cross gules (de Burgh), 4th: (Mortimer))[1] These arms were also borne by Arthur Plantagenet, 1st Viscount Lisle, KG, (died 1542), the illegitimate son of Edward IV The Duke's connection with this church, the parish church of the influential and important Rolle family of Stevenstone, lords of the manor of St Giles-in-the-Wood and Great Torrington (and many others) is not clear. The Rolle Manorial Chapel was for the private use of the Rolle family, lords of the manor. The parish church of Potheridge House was at Merton, 2.9 km to the S-E of Potheridge. It is not known where the Duke's residence in Devon was, if any, whilst his mansion of Potheridge was being rebuilt on a grand scale after 1660. Was he perhaps resident at the Rolle seat of Stevenstone House, 600 metres to the NW of the church and 4.7 km N-E of Potheridge (a crossing of the River Torridge would be required), whilst his new mansion was being re-built? The Rolles had other seats, including Bicton on the south coast of Devon |
Date | Sculpture c.1660-1669; photo 2014 |
Source | Self-photographed |
Author | (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 18:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)) |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
![]() |
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:24, 30 March 2014 | ![]() | 1,497 × 1,527 (1.67 MB) | Lobsterthermidor (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description ={{en|1=Heraldic monument to General George Monck, 1st Duke of Albemarle, external wall above north (Stevenstone) private doorway to the parish church of St Giles in the Wood, North Devon, 3 miles north-east of Potheridge,... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following 2 pages use this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Image title | OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA |
---|---|
Camera manufacturer | OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. |
Camera model | SZ-15,DZ-100 |
Exposure time | 1/125 sec (0.008) |
F-number | f/3 |
ISO speed rating | 100 |
Date and time of data generation | 17:29, 16 May 2000 |
Lens focal length | 4.5 mm |
JPEG file comment | ****JPEG Compressor Copyright (C) 1991-1997 STOIK Software Ltd.**** |
Software used | Irodio Photo & Video Studio |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 314 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 314 dpi |
File change date and time | 17:29, 16 May 2000 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exposure Program | Creative program (biased toward depth of field) |
Exif version | 2.3 |
Date and time of digitizing | 17:29, 16 May 2000 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 3.17 APEX (f/3) |
Metering mode | Center weighted average |
Light source | Unknown |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 0 |
Focal length in 35 mm film | 25 mm |
Scene capture type | Portrait |
Scene control | None |
Contrast | Normal |
Saturation | Normal |
Sharpness | Normal |