File:An example of the remarkable cultural complexity of the Deccan....jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file(512 × 683 pixels, file size: 136 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
A SILK DECCANI PRAYER RUG
Author
Central India
Title
A SILK DECCANI PRAYER RUG
Description
English: "A SILK DECCANI PRAYER RUG. Central India, last quarter 19th century or earlier. The ivory field with a pair of polychrome baluster vases issuing delicate floral sprays surrounded by bold scrolling vine, hanging grapes, delicate floral motifs and a stylised cypress tree, an ivory rectangular lozenge enclosing stylised fish, animals, a central fountain and blue spandrels, all below a rectangular Turkish style prayer panel with a pair of blue floral columns supporting a central handing triple bell-shaped vase above, in a brick-red floral frame with a blue floral band below and light blue and brick-red arcaded angular arch above containing delicate floral and stylised plant-motifs, ivory angular floral band above, in a light blue dense angular floral border between ivory and pistachio-green meandering flowerhead vine stripes, outer reciprocal skittle-pattern stripes, even wear, slight splitting, dry. 6ft.5in. x 5ft.2in. (196cm. x 157cm.)."

"Lot Notes: There is nothing quite like this remarkable rug in the published literature. It combines a central motif from Turkey with various other motifs from India, particularly the border, and also has a number of features which could demonstrate a Persian origin. Only one rug has been published which in any way resembles it; a piece which appeared at auction in 1992 (Sotheby's London, 28 April 1992, lot 167).

Both rugs are technically similar, being made with a very flat back and with tightly trimmed pile. Both have intricate main borders between multiple minor stripes, and fields which have a variety of motifs all of which have been very delicately drawn. In both there is a central panel of design and a variety of fish in the lower part, which here is a pond while on the other it is a stream, together with very delicately drawn floral motifs at either side. Both also use a great variety of vibrant colours. And they even have an identical outermost guard stripe, not only in design, which is after all very frequently encountered, but also in the same colour combination.

The larger carpet is thought to have been made in the Deccan in the early 18th century. This attribution and dating were made by comparing the motifs to those of Indian painting, as well as a certain superficial similarity to the well-known group of 18th century pashmina carpets. With no published rugs to compare it to, the attribution made perfect sense. The weaver of the present rug obviously started off with the intention of weaving another floral design; the bases of two trees very similar to the central tree of the larger carpet can be distinguished above the two sides of the pool. But then the design completely changed, and a completely foreign motif of a Turkish prayer rug was superimposed. The Turkish rug itself is a combination of various Anatolian originals. One can see motifs typical of Ghiordes in the lower dark and upper light blue cross-panels. These have been combined with elements from Ladik in the red arched cross-panel and the blue spandrels. And hanging from the central arch is a lamp which looks at first glance to be remarkably 19th century Birmingham in form.

There is little doubt that the rug was made in India, and an attribution to the Deccan cannot be refuted. The presence of the Turkish elements within the design however make an early 18th century date virtually impossible. The rugs which have these designs can be traced back to the second half of the 18th century and thus, with the possible exception of the hanging lamp, an 18th century date is not precluded. If, however, the date is as early as this, what were Turkish prayer rugs, of a type not designed for export, doing in India? They would have seemed remarkably coarse in weave to the patrons who would have appreciated the present rug. It is more probable that the designs were incorporated from one of the first carpet books produced, in the last quarter of the nineteenth century.

Despite all the discussion about origin and in particular dating, which this rug will provoke, it is certainly beautifully made and with a brilliant finesse of drawing and colour which is very rare to find in rugs."
Date last quarter 19th century or earlier.
Source/Photographer

Licensing

[edit]
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).

The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain".
This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain in the United States. In other jurisdictions, re-use of this content may be restricted; see Reuse of PD-Art photographs for details.
{{PD-Art}} template without license parameter: please specify why the underlying work is public domain in both the source country and the United States
(Usage: {{PD-Art|1=|deathyear=''year of author's death''|country=''source country''}}, where parameter 1= can be PD-old-auto, PD-old-auto-expired, PD-old-auto-1996, PD-old-100 or similar. See Commons:Multi-license copyright tags for more information.)

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current06:01, 17 April 2012Thumbnail for version as of 06:01, 17 April 2012512 × 683 (136 KB)Sridhar1000 (talk | contribs)from real source.
04:21, 16 April 2012Thumbnail for version as of 04:21, 16 April 2012512 × 683 (136 KB)Sridhar1000 (talk | contribs)

Metadata