File:American quarterly of roentgenology (1909) (14754279861).jpg

Identifier: americanquarterl02amer (find matches)
Title: American quarterly of roentgenology
Year: 1909 (1900s)
Authors: American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects: Nuclear Medicine Radiography Radiology Radiology
Publisher: Pittsburgh : American Roentgen Ray Society
Contributing Library: Francis A. Countway Library of Medicine
Digitizing Sponsor: Open Knowledge Commons and the National Endowment for the Humanities

View Book Page: Book Viewer
About This Book: Catalog Entry
View All Images: All Images From Book
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.

Text Appearing Before Image:
28% which this information brought about no doubt tended toincrease general interest at this time. Just why there is sucha decrease in the year 1907 is not known. It is apparentlydue to chance more than anything else. Minutes Axxual M eeting 255 Chart three answers the question, Did you at this time take up the practical application of the rays? It is inter-esting to note that as many as 92% answered in the affirma-tive and but 4^2% did not. The remainder took it up fromtwo to five years later. This indicates the absorbing interestwhich immediately controlled those who became interestedin the art at all. Chart four answers the question, Did you continue withyour established medical work? 87% apparently did, where- Chart VIII. (Continued)
Text Appearing After Image:
50% m% as 13% forsook the pursuits in which they were then en-gaged. Chart five asks the question, Have you now relinquishedyour established work? 31% say they have, whereas 69%say not. Chart six asks the question, Are you now practicing Roent-genology as an absolute specialty? 27% are, 73% are not.This chart seems to show how really few absolute specialistsin Roentgenology there are in this country. 256 American Quarterly of Roentgenology Chart seven. Of those who have not relinquished theirestablished work the question is asked, Are you in generalpractice, or in a specialty other than Roentgenology? 40%say they are still in general practice. 35% announce thatthey are in a specialty other than Roentgenology. 25%, maketheir reply no. This latter reply seems to indicate that thequestion was ambiguous and I easily imagine it might havebeen misunderstood. Chart eight is the most interesting one. It asks the ques-tion, What proportion of the medical profession in yourcommunity is educated

Note About Images