File:Ada Mae Sharpless, 1935.jpg
Original file (507 × 657 pixels, file size: 112 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionAda Mae Sharpless, 1935.jpg |
English: The sculpture was negatively reviewed by Arthur Miller in the Los Angeles Times, January 13, 1935, pg. A6. Miller quotes from Sharpless's letter written in response, defending her work, in the Los Angeles Times, January 27, 1935, pg. A8. |
Date | |
Source | https://digital.library.ucla.edu/catalog/ark:/21198/zz002ckt7g |
Author | Los Angeles Times |
Licensing
[edit]This image comes from the Los Angeles Times Photographic Collection at the UCLA Library.
Copyright for the photographs in the archive was deeded to UCLA. The bulk of images digitized from the archive have been published by UCLA under a CC-BY 4.0 license.
|
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 05:52, 12 February 2022 | 507 × 657 (112 KB) | Reppop (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by Los Angeles Times from https://digital.library.ucla.edu/catalog/ark:/21198/zz002ckt7g with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on es.wikipedia.org
- Usage on ro.wikipedia.org
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Date and time of data generation | 21:50, 11 February 2022 |
---|---|
Orientation | Normal |
Software used | Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 |
File change date and time | 21:51, 11 February 2022 |
Date and time of digitizing | 21:50, 11 February 2022 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 51 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 51 |
Color space | sRGB |