File:A possible Neolithic retouched flake possibly from blade manufacture (FindID 957926).jpg
Original file (2,892 × 2,526 pixels, file size: 1.68 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]A possible Neolithic retouched flake possibly from blade manufacture | |||
---|---|---|---|
Photographer |
The Portable Antiquities Scheme, Edward Caswell, 2019-07-05 09:10:44 |
||
Title |
A possible Neolithic retouched flake possibly from blade manufacture |
||
Description |
English: A possible Neolithic retouched flake possibly from blade manufacture. The fragment is from a tertiary flake of flint. The flint is a mottled grey and white with a little orange staining. It has a semi-glossy patina.
It is sub-rectangular in plan although the right edge, as seen from the dorsal surface, is slightly longer than the left giving it a point. Its right edge has small short traces of low angled, sub-parallel retouch in its central third above which is a small v-shaped chip. The dorsal surface shows two negative flake removals while the ventral surface has none. Its left edge has similarly low angled and parallel retouch across its length. The proximal end of the flint appears to have been snapped, although the differential colouration of this section suggests this occurred after its deposition. The distal end has a less clean break with an irregular edge but is similarly more darkly coloured. The flake is 27.2mm long, 15.0mm wide, 4.4mm thick and weighs 1.98 grams This artefact is part of a larger assemblage of other flint artefacts that has been found at the spot indicated. Those flints and chert pieces which can be dated appear to date from the Neolithic (starting c. 4000 BC), due to the presence of several end scrapers and the evidence of wide blade production, to the early Bronze Age (ending c.1600 BC), due to the presence of multi-platform working and thumbnail scrapers. However, it is not inconceivable that some of these flints may also date from the Mesolithic period as some pieces of debitage show narrow blade technology. Similarly scrapers have a wide period of use dating as late as even the Late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age the flints from these periods typically being coarse as some of the debitage found.Nearby another assemblage has similar characteristics but also with an Early Bronze Age component ( c.2400-1600 BC), due to the presence of multi-platform working and thumbnail scrapers such that a Neolithic date is more likely for these cores. |
||
Depicted place | (County of findspot) Somerset | ||
Date | between 4000 BC and 1600 BC | ||
Accession number |
FindIdentifier: 957926 |
||
Credit line |
|
||
Source |
https://finds.org.uk/database/ajax/download/id/1064093 Catalog: https://finds.org.uk/database/images/image/id/1064093/recordtype/artefacts archive copy at the Wayback Machine Artefact: https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/957926 |
||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Attribution License |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 05:25, 24 December 2020 | 2,892 × 2,526 (1.68 MB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | Portable Antiquities Scheme, SOM, FindID: 957926-1064093, neolithic, page 1977, batch count 2813 |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Orientation | Normal |
---|---|
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows |
File change date and time | 11:37, 1 July 2019 |
Color space | sRGB |
Image width | 2,892 px |
Image height | 2,526 px |
Date and time of digitizing | 12:37, 1 July 2019 |
Date metadata was last modified | 12:37, 1 July 2019 |
Unique ID of original document | xmp.did:067E63D2EA9BE911A4B891A284B40CE7 |