File:2018 09 18 statement about Mark Judge by US Senate Judiciary Democrats.png
Original file (1,120 × 356 pixels, file size: 141 KB, MIME type: image/png)
Captions
Summary
[edit]Description2018 09 18 statement about Mark Judge by US Senate Judiciary Democrats.png |
English: All ten Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, including Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Tuesday outlined ways in which Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is upending the investigation and public hearing into Dr. Blasey Ford’s allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault:
The senators wrote: “Now, just two days after Dr. Blasey Ford shared her story with the public, Republicans are again rushing forward with a hearing within a week. This time, they are doing so without demanding the FBI perform a background investigation like it did in 1991. As you know, the FBI is not being asked to perform a criminal investigation; rather it is being asked to do an evaluation of the allegations as part of its review of Judge Kavanaugh’s record. Like in 1991, this is an important step in providing the Committee the facts. In this case, it is particularly important as there have been press reports about a polygraph test, medical records, and multiple witnesses. “Unfortunately, the Majority also announced the hearing without confirming whether Dr. Blasey Ford is available on that date. We also understand Republicans are planning on only inviting Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Blasey Ford to testify. While the Committee unquestionably needs to hear from both, there are other relevant witnesses who should be questioned under oath, in a public setting. This includes Mark Judge, who Dr. Blasey Ford identified, and others that might be identified through the FBI’s investigation or subsequent due diligence by the Committee itself.” |
Date | |
Source | US Senator Patrick Leahy |
Author | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Democrats |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This United States Congress image is in the public domain. This may be because it was taken by an employee of the Congress as part of that person’s official duties, or because it has been released into the public domain and posted on the official websites of a member of Congress. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the image is in the public domain.
English ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ македонски ∙ español ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ العربية ∙ +/− |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:32, 23 September 2018 | 1,120 × 356 (141 KB) | Sagecandor (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Image width | 1,120 px |
---|---|
Image height | 356 px |
Width | 1 px |