File:1 Sho - Xuantong Baozang (宣統寶藏) - Scott Semans 02.jpg
Original file (634 × 834 pixels, file size: 211 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
[edit]Description1 Sho - Xuantong Baozang (宣統寶藏) - Scott Semans 02.jpg |
English: CHINESE DYNASTIC COINAGE
PHOTO Y# DESCRIPTION PRICE QIAN LONG SILVER : (1792-96) Dot in square s. Qian Long Tong Bao, 4 clouds s. Chinese year at compass points separated by dots, R: same in Tibetan; Dodpal Mint. The Yr. 58 1/2 Tangka has crescent in square vs. dot. For Yr. 58 four denominations were made, distinguishable only by size and weight: 1/2 Sho (5 Fen) 19-21mm, ±1.7-1.9gm; 1/2 Tanga (3/4 Sho) 21-22mm, ±2.6-2.8gm; Sho (Qian) ±3.45-3.87gm; Tanga (1 1/2 Qian) ±5.3-5.7gm. Variable sizes in the Qian Long Sho and Tangka create subtypes. For later years only the Sho was issued. Yr. 58 coins may have been struck later as well, to honor the year of conquest. Rhodes (SH100, referring to the Jia Qing Yr. 8-9 issues) believes that the variation in number of dots in the margins was deliberate and reflects mint organization. Informational Photos: 1/2 SHO 3/4 SHO SMALL SHO MEDIUM SHO, Yr. 58 MEDIUM SHO, Yr. 59 MEDIUM SHO, Yr. 60 LARGE SHO LARGE TANGKA JIA QING SHO : (1796-1820) Dot in square s. Jia Qing Tong Bao, 4 clouds s. Chinese year at compass points separated by dots, R: same in Tibetan; Dodpal Mint. JQ = Bertsch, Gabrisch & Rhodes, "A Study of Sino-Tibetan Coins of the Jia Qing Era," J. East Asian Numismatics #7 (V. 2 #4, 1995), pp. 23-34. The sloppy engraving found after about JQ2 or 3 is explained by some of the Chinese mint workers having been called back. The large number of unintentional varieties, particularly for Yr. 25, could be classified differently or in greater detail. Dots are shown as O/R, or O top + bottom /R top + bottom. Yrs. 2-6 are rare. Informational Photos: Yr. 1 VARIETIES Yr. 5 Yr. 24 VARIETIES Yr. 25 VARIETIES #1 Yr. 25 VARIETIES #2 Yr. 8 VARIETIES SHO Yr. 9 TYPES DAO GUANG SHO : (1821-50) Dot in square s. Dao Guang Tong Bao, 4 clouds s. Chinese year at compass points separated by dots, R: same in Tibetan; Dodpal Mint. For two-digit dates, number of dots in each location are coded as: Obv L + R + Bottom / Rev L + R + Bottom. Informational Photos: Yr. 2 VARIETIES Yr. 3 VARIETIES Yr. 4 VARIETIES Yr. 15 VARIETIES XUAN TONG SILVER : (1910), Xuan Tong Bao Zhang, R: coiled dragon, denomination & Xuan-tong legends, 1 Sho: ±21.4-21.8mm, ±3.3-4.0g; 2 Sho: 24.6-25.2mm, ±6.4-8.1g, Dode Mint. Varieties: 1 Sho: Number of beads in central circles (20-24 obv), and orientation of 5-petal flower varies; 2 Sho: Number of beads in circles varies (24-32 obv). Informational Photos: SHO VARIETIES 2 SHO VARIETIES XUAN TONG 1/4 SHO : Norbu in square s. Xuan Tong, year 1 (1909), denomination, in Tibetan, in quadrants of square, s. rosettes & clouds, R: Concentric circles, dots s. LEGEND in fleur. with arcs between, 25.8mm, 5.8-7.6-9.0?g, Dode Mint. The most obvious varieties are by size of inner square and petal (obv.) and inner circle (rev.); Bertsch shows a variety with dot in inner circle. The crescents to fleur., and fleur. to outer circle may connect, or not. All published varieties appear to be brass. Informational Photos: 1/4 SHO VARIETIES 1/4 SHO FORGERIES . |
Date | |
Source | Tibet (CoinCoin.com). |
Author | Scott Semans |
Licensing
[edit]This file comes from the Scott Semans World Coins (CoinCoin.com) website and is copyrighted. |
The copyright holder of this file, has released this file under a Creative Commons license. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Scott Semans World Coins (CoinCoin.com)
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 20:23, 21 October 2019 | 634 × 834 (211 KB) | Donald Trung (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Date and time of data generation | 21:49, 21 October 2019 |
---|---|
Orientation | Normal |
Software used | Windows Photo Editor |
File change date and time | 21:59, 21 October 2019 |
Date and time of digitizing | 21:49, 21 October 2019 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 00 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 00 |
Color space | sRGB |
Rating (out of 5) | 4 |