Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2017/Meetings/2017-05-03

2017-05-03

Dashboard kick-off

Scope for this year

• Identify which images are participating
• Track information about these files
  • Give status update to users
    • Push or pull ? Does not really matter for now.
      • Push too early might discourage people. But in the future it might be possible.

Audience: participants and organizers

Collecting requirements: we have a set collected in Como. Try to do it light this year, build a basis.

Open questions:

• • What maintenance categories are in use?
  • Check if we can expose the output publicly (privacy)

The system tracks images and pings organizers / create reports when the status of the image changes.

• Set of conditions (exhausted)
  • nominated-for-deletion
  • no EXIF data
  • a file being renamed/deleted
  • upload outside of the competition timeframe
  • bad image: selfie
  • very similar photos on the web
  • WLM template removed
  • monument identifier removed
  • new uploads of the same image by a different user
• Events: notifications to someone
  • read below for details
• MVP: nominated-for-deletion (generalisation: bad flagging template added) and, for example, no EXIF data, must handle file rename/deletion/re-uploads.

Notification options:

• for organizers: real-time dashboard
  • Provide a list of images per condition, with a potential action. Some actions may get duplicated/logged on the talkpage
  • Log-in for specific campaigns, at least for taking actions (i.e. 'marking as safe').
• “give me the status of this set of images” ; most obvious selection criterion is per-country (for organisers) and per-uploader (mostly for participants)

Timelines:

• 2 months

Resources:

• Design
• Front-end
• Back-end
• Design research/User testing (nice-to-have)
• Languages and translaiton

Next steps: summarize, share in the group, onboard Stephen. This year we want to build the dashboard that reports on certain templates, EXIF data, log entries. Focus primarily on organizers this year.

• I am Jean-Fred and I approve this summary 👍

(A) Lodewijk will summarize