Comment I wonder whether the chosen scope isn't too narrow. Neither related category in Commons, nor dedicated article in any wikipedia, unless I'm wrong. --Myrabella (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The scope seems quite narrow. However, there is a very short mention of "Suq Aftimos" in fr:Quartier chrétien de la vieille ville de Jérusalem and in en:Muristan. In he:מוריסטן, this photo shows the "Suq Aftimos" if I trust the caption of the image in that article read through the Google rough translation. As it shows a market, which is a common sense of the word "suq" (also "souq" or "souk"), I tend to prefer it. Of course, I may be wrong => further nominator's explanations welcome if necessary. --Myrabella (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Suq (or Shook) means market in Hebrew. File:Muristan2.jpg shows the same location (with the exception of a few feet) as this Image, however it lacks source and author information. Geocoding it is possible, as it has the same Golocation as my Image. Maybe the scope should be changed to Murisitan? --Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your explanations. After some readings, I think that "Suq Aftimos" may be considered as a "suitably generic scope"—and en:muristan speak of it a bit less shortly now ;-) There are several strong candidates under this scope, IMO: the nominated image, File:Muristan2.jpg (its description has been completed) and File:Muristan shop.jpg for a view inside the market (tranferred from :de:w) => what about a MVR? Changing the scope to "Muristan" may be an option too. But I read that the Muristan has been divided in two parts in the past, a German eastern part (with the Lutheran Church of the Redeemer) and a Greek western one (with the market) so I wonder if a suitable image for this alternative scope shouldn't show elements of both parts. Nevertheless, Commons is presently rather poor in this respect, so perhaps it may be a good idea. Other contributors' advice welcome. --Myrabella (talk) 12:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment, I've decided to open a MVR. --Rastaman3000 (talk)
