Photographic quality is subjective here. But there are problems sharper. missing geocoding, and caption in English. The scope must be reduced to "interior". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is a Valued image candidate, not a Quality image candidate. It does not have to have technically high quality, but it have to be valuable in an illustrative sense. The horizon line is, as far as I can see, straight. It should be since the camera was resting on a flat and level surface. PS: I've added coordinates. /ℇsquilo07:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is true that we do not consider that the intrinsic value of the image, not the photographic quality. But it is necessary to VI, caring for captions. We need a caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
