Commons:Valued image candidates/Steel Bridge, Portland, Oregon.jpg

Steel Bridge, Portland, Oregon.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	Tiptoety talk on 2009-01-21 03:55 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Railroad bridge in Portland, Oregon
Used in	Global usage Neighborhoods of Portland, Oregon
Review (criteria)	Oppose Idon't think a VI can have artifical colours like these. --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)  CommentI was unaware of such criteria, but if someone could direct me to where it says that I will withdraw. Tiptoety talk 19:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)  Info The guideline refers to Reasonable sharpness, lighting, composition, and angle of view, I'm not certain if a rich color would disqualify under those terms, since the objects are displayed in a natural, if rich, color. MBisanz talk 20:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)  Oppose I would simply refer to "illustrates its subject well", which in my opinion disqualifies unnatural renderings. I think this kind of picture cannot be VI because it does not depicts the usual appearance of the subject (it is not representative of the scope). This has of course nothing to do with the quality of the picture. --Eusebius (talk) 09:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 2 oppose => declined. Eusebius (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)