Commons:Valued image candidates/Saudi Hawks90.jpg

Saudi Hawks90.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Meshari Alawfi (talk) on 2023-09-24 20:09 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Saudi Hawks
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Does the image show the real colors? -- Spurzem (talk) 12:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC) Yes, Just the sky shift it to grayscale by white balance Meshari Alawfi (talk) 17:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) Done, Scope Corrected Meshari Alawfi (talk) 16:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)  Oppose This one is better though ineligible as VI with watermark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC) There is a lot of ineligible images better than here but we talk about eligible one, and that why we are here to support eligible images and make it free to use under creative commons, if you have other reason you can write it Meshari Alawfi (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC) I have copied this from the VI guidelines Can a comparison be made with Commons images that would not themselves qualify as VIs? Yes. It is perfectly possible to oppose a nomination on the grounds that another Commons image is 'more valuable', even if that image could not itself be a VI candidate (eg because it is not geocoded). I can't find the guideline that says images cannot have watermarks, but I think it may be a rule. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC) "ineligible" you think it may be a rule, that strange! in basic understanding of the word "ineligible" you can't take it a rule because that is out of rule here, you just now make a new rule from your own self, when want to oppose i hope you provide a reasonable reason and not an excuses. Meshari Alawfi (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC) I am afraid I cannot understand what you mean by "you just now make a new rule from your own self". I simply copied a guideline! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC) i mean when you comparison ineligible with eligible and take that as rule, in simple way you can choose eligible image and comparison with that. finally that your opinion Meshari Alawfi (talk) 16:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 1 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)