Commons:Valued image candidates/Neil Patrick Harris (9446191273).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neil Patrick Harris (9446191273).jpg

undecided
Image
Nominated by George Ho (talk) on 2017-02-20 09:30 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neil Patrick Harris at the 2013 Comic Con
Used in Global usage
Reason Taken at 2013 Comic Con. Nice smile and pose. -- George Ho (talk)
Review
(criteria)
  •  Question - Why are none of these pictures in Category:Neil Patrick Harris, and how are we supposed to figure out which picture is best in scope if we have to wade through a bunch of "Neil Patrick Harris by year" subcategories? It seems like this category has somehow gotten messed up, but I don't know how. It should be unmessed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed it, Ikan. --George Ho (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. Unfortunately, now I feel like there are so many photos, I can't look through all of them and decide which is best in scope. Should I restrict myself to judging just these three photos? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... shall I split three nominations into individually scoped nominations then? I'll split the scope into three yearly scopes. --George Ho (talk) 08:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Pinging Ikan. 08:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I tend not to think so. I don't think he will be recognizably different in consecutive years. Someone will probably take the time to look through all of the photos and determine to their satisfaction which is most useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You can, Ikan, either limit to just three photos or nominate the fourth photo yourself. There is File:Neil Patrick Harris - Streamy Awards 2009 (2).jpg, but it has too much lighting. --George Ho (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed other pictures, but they do not come close to the three. There are other Comic Con 2013 photos of this guy, but I would rather pick something less silly and more... how do you call it? --George Ho (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think you can vote more than one photo of the same scope if you can. --George Ho (talk) 22:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: I have an idea. What if I can narrow the scope of this nomination to just "Neil Patrick Harris at the 2013 Comic Con"? Would this work? --George Ho (talk) 09:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think you could. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I narrowed down the scope and then reset the nomination time. --George Ho (talk) 09:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Ikan, I split the nomination away from the "Most Valued review candidates" section and put it into another section. --George Ho (talk) 09:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Remember he was a noted child actor too. Charles (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose I don't think we want VIs of people at every location they've ever attended unless it was significant, in which case it should be in scope i.e. getting an Oscar; collecting an honour/medal; getting married etc. (was this?). See current MVR below. Charles (talk) 11:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp and Ikan Kekek: Somehow, the nomination was removed from the "New valued image nominations" section. I re-broadened the scope to reflect the removal and then reinserted the nomination back to MVR. --George Ho (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg: 0
2. 5.3.10NeilPatrickHarrisByDavidShankbone.jpg: 0
3. Neil Patrick Harris 2011 (cropped).jpg: 0
4. Neil Patrick Harris (9446191273).jpg: 0 <--
=>
File:NeilPatrickHarrisHWOFSept2011.jpg: Undecided.
File:5.3.10NeilPatrickHarrisByDavidShankbone.jpg: Undecided.
File:Neil Patrick Harris 2011 (cropped).jpg: Undecided.
File:Neil Patrick Harris (9446191273).jpg: Undecided. <--
--DeFacto (talk). 20:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]