Commons:Valued image candidates/Mimetes cucullatus (flower).JPG

Mimetes cucullatus (flower).JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Martinvl (talk) on 2015-12-10 21:30 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Mimetes cucullatus (Common mimetes or red pagoda) - inflorescence
Used in	Global usage
Reason	I believe that photographically this image is on a par other images of this plant in Commons, but, unlike the other images, is both geocoded and Wikilinked. -- Martinvl (talk)
Review (criteria)	Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 22:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)  Oppose The current scope is the default reference to the habitus. In this case this is the best: file:Mimetes cucullatus - Rooistompie - Cape 1.jpg. If the scope is limited to flower then the image is better. Beware the binomial must be italicized. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: Hi - I note your suggestions about changing the scope of this submission. I agree with writing "Mimetes cucullatus" in italics and I am happy to add "Flower" to the scope. I do not agree with the common name being "Rooistompie". I checked the Kirstenbosch and they show "Rooistompe" as an Afrikaans name and give a number of different English names. I have added an Afrikaans language text. I suggest that since we use English, that we use "(common mimetess or red padoga)" as the common name for purposes of the scope. Also, I do not believe that it is normal to add the locality of a plant to a scope - see for example. Martinvl (talk) 19:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment @Martinvl: I think you have misunderstood Archaeodontosaurus's remarks. As I read it, "file:Mimetes cucullatus - Rooistompie - Cape 1.jpg" is an image file, and not his suggested scope. He is saying that this other image is the better image for the default (habitus) scope you have nominated in. He is also saying (I think) that if you add the word "flower" to your scope, then your image is the better in that. Hope that helps. DeFacto (talk). 20:37, 11 December 2015 (UTC)  Comment As far as I can see, it is not a flower but an inflorescence. --Llez (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC) @DeFacto: , @Archaeodontosaurus: - I misread Archaeodontosaurus' posting and I have struck out a large section of my response to him. Following on @Llez: 's observation, I propose changing the scope to "Mimetes cucullatus (Common mimetes or red pagoda) - inflorescence" I agree with this proposal. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC) Scope changed from Mimetes cucullatus (Red pagoda) to Mimetes cucullatus (Common mimetes or red pagoda) - inflorescence --Martinvl (talk) 07:57, 12 December 2015 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".  Support Perfect with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:21, 12 December 2015 (UTC)  Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)  Support OK for me --Llez (talk) 12:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 0 oppose => promoted. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 23:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)