Commons:Valued image candidates/Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg

declined
Image
Nominated by Charles (talk) on 2016-12-02 12:29 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acraea lycoa (Lycoa acraea) dorsal
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose The greater part of the butterfly is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Of course it is not a perfect image. Still valuable for identifying the species. Remember, I could say for many VIs of views: 'The greater part of the xxx is not visible' Charles (talk) 10:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think images with basic technical defects should not receive any awards. VI is not QI, but there are some borders of quality that should be taken into account when evaluating images. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image is not of a landscape or immobile building. Charles (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This may have a sharpness issue, but it's the best we have currently. I don't think the sharpness issue is damaging to the EV too much either. The butterfly is still clearly and easily identifiable. lNeverCry 18:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Dimorphic acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female.jpg: +2
=>
File:Lycoa acraea (Acraea lycoa).jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Dimorphic acraea (Acraea lycoa lycoa) female.jpg: Promoted.
-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Lycoa_acraea_(Acraea_lycoa).jpg&oldid=661515529"