I don't know, it just occurred to me that there might be a potential conflict between two images if one is posted directly from the front and this one has both front and sides. For instance, this image show the front, so isn't that technically a better fit with the current scope? (Depending on the model year too, of course). --Peulle (talk) 12:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
O.K. Perhaps in this case it were better to say „front and side“ or „side-view left“. But as the other image is not good I think it is not necessary. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Peulle, I understand your concern, but we have a sort of convention (based on a talkpage discussion from a year or two ago) that "normal" cars only need two scopes - "front three-quarter" and "rear three-quarter" and these have become abbreviated to "front" and "rear". For some cars (e.g. if the two sides are not symmetrical or there is a unique feature on the front or rear not visible from a three-quarter view) other scopes may be desirable. I think this car only needs the two scopes. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
