Commons:Valued image candidates/Klaudia Cieśla 5439.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Klaudia Cieśla 5439.jpg

declined
Image
Nominated by Spongie555 (talk) on 2010-09-22 03:12 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klaudia Ciesla
Used in Global usage
Reason Good picture of her modeling. Like in this nomination of her it should be exempt of geocoding beacuse it is in an unknown location. -- Spongie555 (talk)
Review
(criteria)

There is already a nomination for this scope. If you dislike it, you may open a MVR. --Ikar.us (talk) 08:40, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think an oppose should not be based on beacuse you don't think the person deserves a scope. Spongie555 (talk) 22:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? This is a practice in the VI project. See the nominations above.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment For a person as for a church, reviewers are supposed to look at the notability. This person has an article on its own in WP in 14 languages; in most cases they are not stubs and they contain references (see the article in French for example). --Myrabella (talk) 06:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I saw that there is an article in WP but this means nothing. Do you know how many articles in WP are with disputable rights to be in the encyclopedia? There are thousands of them. This is a big problem for WP - resolving what is ok and what's not. By the way, when I saw the article about this girl I started consideration to nominate it for deletion in accordance with the rules there.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, a first deletion request has been uncessful on en:WP (seems to have been violently disputed). --Myrabella (talk) 11:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. So, I think that this supports my reservations.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 11:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion has been discussed on de:WP too. --Myrabella (talk) 12:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Klaudia Cieśla 1419.jpg: -3
2. Klaudia Cieśla 5439.jpg: -2 
=>
File:Klaudia Cieśla 1419.jpg: Declined
File:Klaudia Cieśla 5439.jpg: Declined.
--George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Klaudia_Cieśla_5439.jpg&oldid=44470928"