Very good picture of showing her model since she is a model. I think it should be exempt from geocoding because its a staged shot and we dont know where it was taken -- Spongie555 (talk)
I don't think the author is active beacuse he has messages on his talk page from 2009 also he has a warning against him,could have scared him off, so idk if he is still around my guess is that he isn't active. Spongie555 (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In principal, I agree that a good image of a moveable object in an arbitrary location shouldn't be declined because the location is unknown. But we're used to require geocoding even if the location isn't visible at all. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I wonder that if all the people here are so sensitive to notability of the scopes then what is this silence? Or maybe there are different rules for different people or topics. In my view this is a very strange idea this person to have its own scope. Both photos can compete only for scope - “European young models”.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If someone is notable in the photo you give as example I think that it is Amitabh Bachchan and that's for sure, imo. The girl presented here is just one of the thousands girls that are favoured today by someone behind the scenes. Tomorow there will be another girl in this screen. It is the face and some other physical parts that are used here. The name of the girl is not important at all and will be forgotten after a year or five unless she become some high-standing person's wife, imo.--MrPanyGoff (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is relative, was said in the presenter's promotion. I'd compare him to e.g. Peter Rapp. The local audience in India is hundred times bigger than in Austria, but both are local celebrities. The girl seems the only non-Indian participant in that major Indian TV show. This I regard as a notable oddity. (And about physical parts - Amitabh Bachchan's success is credited to his very masculine voice...) --Ikar.us (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
