Comment - I doubt there's anything recognizably different about English as opposed to French or some other nation's lavender fields, though I stand to be corrected. But if I'm right, this wouldn't in my opinion be a useful scope. I notice that there's as of yet no VI for Category:Lavender fields. This is a nice photo, but we might be able to find a sharper one for the general category. There appears to currently be only one QI in that category, File:Snowshil-Lavender.jpg and I think it's useful mostly in that it shows a few varieties of lavender, but as it doesn't typify what a lavender field looks like, I wouldn't support it for VI in that category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Support - I just looked through the category and all subcategories of Category:Lavender fields, and while there are several very good candidates for VI in this scope, I think this is the most useful good photo in showing the appearance of a cultivated lavender field and lacking distractions (e.g., other plants, houses, mountains in the background). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
