The scope is too general. I suggest something like "XYZ avalanche safety equipment". It is quite feasible that there are other types of avalanche safety equipment that are so different to the one shown that they warrant their own VI.
The image description has no links to Wikipeida, so how do I know what a "Antiavalanche Gazex system" is? Is "Gazex" a trade name or is it a generic type of safety device?
Comment I have modified the English description on the image page to take your comments into account. Maybe you could make a similar change to the Russian text.
Comment I would now happily support this nomination, but since I have been involved in the presentation, I would prefer third party input. Martinvl (talk) 11:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd like to suggest two further tweaks to the scope: 1) remove the "initiated by propane-oxygen detonation" – that's something for the file description page. 2) Add the trade mark, as that's how people know it (we also do this for most other "products", be it cameras or airplanes). So in the end, I'd propose something like Gazek remote avalanche-release system. --El Grafo (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
