The other pictures in the category seems showing the main entry, and a brighter part of façade. Therefore they depict the subject better IMO. --Jebulon (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The nominated photo gives the clear, even detailed idea of the basic architectural order which I cannot see watching the other two images. The photo represents the entire western elevation which faces one of the major boulevards in the city. Yes, it is the short elevation but that's the way here. The same as with the churches, for instance, If you choose one of the facades, no matter the long one or the short one, then the features of the other ones cannot be seen. The nominated image doesn't include the main entrance but it shows the characteristic pediment (fronton), in return, which can be seen only in this view. Furthermore, the other two images are strongly tilted, cut and in shadow.--MrPanyGoff14:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for answering. You plead very well, are you a lawyer ? I understand your arguments and they look/sound not wrong (even if I don't know Sofia unfortunately), but I'm not fully convinced and the questions stay, in my opinion: is this picture really the most valuable for this building ? Does this photo show a good depiction of the whole subject ? I'm tending to answer "no". I do not decline for now, because I wait for other opinions (BTW, you do a very good job in this page of VIC, thanks for that) --Jebulon (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
