Commons:Valued image candidates/CL - Centro storico con auto storiche 20.jpg

CL - Centro storico con auto storiche 20.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	OppidumNissenae (talk) on 2018-05-15 18:15 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: A Fiat 1500 Cabriolet (1964) front view
Used in	Global usage en:Fiat 1300 and 1500, it:Fiat 1300
Review (criteria)	Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)  Oppose Not the best image in the category gallery. Charles (talk) 09:05, 17 May 2018 (UTC)  Support–Looks to me like only two other images in the category match the scope. One of them is right out for being really grainy. The other one is pretty decent, but I think the nominated image is slightly better—it's higher resolution, and the camera was a bit lower to the ground, letting you see more of the detail. –IagoQnsi (talk) 20:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC) I can see 22 images in the category gallery IagoQnsi. Charles (talk) 12:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: The scope is limited to front views, which only matches 3 of the photos in the category. –IagoQnsi (talk) 13:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC) OK IagoQnsi, but as specialist in this field DeFacto points out, we don't normally slect front-on images for VI scopes. Charles (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: Yeah, I think questioning whether or not the scope is valid, but as the scope is written, this is the best image in scope. I'm not experienced enough with VIC to really judge whether or not this scope should be permitted. –IagoQnsi (talk) 16:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)  Question, we usually have just "front three-quarter" and "rear three-quarter" scopes for cars - or is the front view of this car particularly noteworthy for some reason? -- DeFacto (talk). 20:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC) It is uncommon, but shows the beautiful design of the car.OppidumNissenae (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC) I disagree. It's a poor image in my view. Charles (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)  Oppose, sorry I don't think it is notable for anything only visible in this view. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 2 oppose => undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)