Comment Due to lack of space, this hut can only be photographed either with a long lens (as in this case) or an ultra wideangle with lots of perspective distortion. I think this shot is the best of all we have, even though it is not perfectly sharp. --Domob (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC) -- Domob (talk)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the feedback! That one certainly shows more detail when looking at the picture close up, but at the expense of a weird perspective and difficult lighting. My understanding is that the most valuable picture is what "is best" at thumbnail size to illustrate an article? In that case, I think the nominated picture is much better. --Domob (talk) 05:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't find that perspective that weird. I also don't find the lighting a deal-breaker. I guess I have to oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That's fine for me; I'm not so experienced yet with VI, so if you think the other picture is indeed more valuable, I will nominate that one instead once this nomination is finalised. Thanks for the feedback in any case! --Domob (talk) 06:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Due to lack of space, this hut can only be photographed either with a long lens (as in this case) or an ultra wideangle with lots of perspective distortion. I think this shot is the best of all we have, even though it is not perfectly sharp. --Domob (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC) -- Domob (talk)
