Commons:Valued image candidates/Balance à fléau - 20150802 11h00 (10657).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Balance à fléau - 20150802 11h00 (10657).jpg

declined
Image
Nominated by Medium69 You wanted talk to me? on 2015-12-17 18:30 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flail balance, with its weights, Seine-et-Marne (France)
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)

Scope changed from Balance scales, with its weights to Flail balance, with its weights --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 01:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

@Archaeodontosaurus: Indeed, I have just seen in the rules that only positive votes are canceled by a change in scope. Negative votes remains valid. I really want to delve into the archives to find your own transgression of this rule. It does not matter, but I will be more vigilant for the future.
Explain myself how the field is too broad ... Should we bring the number of weight, their mass? Be serious ... the proposed sufisament field is limited to be useful to a user.
By cons regarding alleged copyright issue, if you feel that there is a problem, do not hesitate to share the image deletion. A vote will be done ... But for me, no problems on that side. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 11:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scope changed from Balance scales, with its weights to Flail balance, with its weights, Seine-et-Marne (France) --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 11:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 00:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
[reply]