Commons:Valued image candidates/AlmandinInde.jpg

AlmandinInde.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2021-03-05 06:08 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Almandine - Facet cutting Oval brilliant upper side
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment I think one should specify the type of cutting style for a gemstone image to be valuable. Is this the underside? It is difficult to display a cut with only one image. The way LLez does his shells is nice. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Indeed the type of cutting is normative here the work is said to be oval . The other sides require a lot of work, we can reduce the scope to the upper side. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Oval is the shape, not the cutting style. The cutting style defines the facets. I think you will need a second image for it to be valuable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Oval is indeed a normative term Cf. International Gem Society --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Oval brilliant is a cutting style as per your reference; I still think you need a clearer image - as per your reference. I'm not trying to be difficult - my wife is in the trade Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC) In this case I bow and add "brilliant" to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks. I still prefer two images, one for the side. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)