Commons:Valued image candidates/Adult Education Centre, Cambridge Road, Waterloo 4.jpg

Adult Education Centre, Cambridge Road, Waterloo 4.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Rodhullandemu (talk) on 2021-04-02 19:44 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Adult Education Centre, Cambridge Road, Waterloo - main range
Used in	Global usage Wikidata:Q26548986
Reason	Probably the best view of the detail of the architecture, without clutter, particularly the car in shadow at bottom right. And you can't see the join. -- Rodhullandemu (talk)
Review (criteria)	Comment It looks to me like we see the largest percentage of the centre in File:Adult Education Centre, Cambridge Road, Waterloo 1.jpg. No? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment But less of the architectural detail, which is the major reason for the Grade II listing. Depends what you think "value" means, I suppose, quality or quantity. Happy to nominate that one under a different scope if you can think of a plausible label for it. In this one, the view is not obstructed by parked cars. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment I don't like that there's an entire wing of the building that we can't see in this photo. I suppose you could qualify this photo's scope by adding "closeup of main wing" or something. The other one, since it shows the entire building, is best in the current scope, or you could qualify its scope by adding something like "overall view" (hopefully a less awkward expression than that, but that's what occurs to me right now). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment Have amended the scope as per the listing to reflect what we are seeing. I'll thing about the other suggestion, but I still don't like the cars in front. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)  Support for this scope. The cars are going to be there, but we still see the entire building in that photo. We can't just make people's automobiles disappear. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 7 April 2021 (UTC)