Oppose The scope is far too narrow. Do we really want every single house mark on every single listed building in Europe to get a VI grading? I don't think so. I would be quite happy to support this nomination if the text "12 Braci Gierymskich Street" were removed from the scope (Unless the nominator can show why this particular housemark is noteworthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinvl (talk • contribs) 06:49, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've made comments on this subject before, but nothing happened despite a consensus for change - see [discussion page]. Archaeodontosaurus made the suggestion that a VI image should be used in an article and that makes sense to me. I submit wildlife images and I always put a VI candidate image into an article, even when a sub-species for instance doesn't have its own page. Charles (talk) 15:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is there not @Jacek Halicki a Polish Commons where this image should be submitted? Also, although I cannot speak Polish, it seems you just removed what seems to be an interesting house mark from the Gmerk article and replaced it with this one (and another). But anyway , my comments do not just relate to this image. Charles (talk) 22:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
