Commons:Valued image candidates/15-09-11 006 Quark Expeditions ship, Sea Adventurer (Nassau registry IMO 7391422), at Griffin Inlet, Beechey Island, Nunavut, Canada.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

15-09-11 006 Quark Expeditions ship, Sea Adventurer (Nassau registry IMO 7391422), at Griffin Inlet, Beechey Island, Nunavut, Canada.jpg

withdrawn
Image
Nominated by GRDN711 (talk) on 2020-09-06 18:50 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sea Adventurer (ship, 1975) - IMO 7391422
Used in Global usage
Reason Quality image showing the Sea Adventurer in the typical Arctic waters where it travels. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Review
(criteria)
  •  Comment Thank you for your thoughths. I agree that the image you cite is a good view of the ship but also has a very low res of 638 KB. The image I propose for VI shows the ship moving and has a much high resolution. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Keep in mind that at VIC, resolution is rarely relevant. The whole point is that these are images to be used as thumbnails in articles, and therefore, only review size is relevant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @Ikan Kekek: @Kestreltail: It is always a little frustrating to see one of my better ship images declined but I accept your rationale within the framework of the VI criteria and will withdraw this image.
For curious, I have nominated another of my ship images, the MS Fram, in a Most Valued Image Review below. What are your thoughts on that image? GRDN711 (talk) 01:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hard for me to say. It's certainly a better picture, but as it's from a different viewpoint, I'm not sure how to compare the photos in terms of usefulness. I'll think about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Accept rationale by reviewers within the framework of the VI criteria and withdraw this image. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates/15-09-11_006_Quark_Expeditions_ship,_Sea_Adventurer_(Nassau_registry_IMO_7391422),_at_Griffin_Inlet,_Beechey_Island,_Nunavut,_Canada.jpg&oldid=454176832"