Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 29 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000-gebied provincie Friesland 27.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Wijnjeterper Schar, Natura 2000 area of Friesland province. Solitaire Pinus sylvestris on heath field.
    --Famberhorst 18:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, the sky is burnt IMHO Ezarate 18:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Oh my dog...for sure not,but ok --Livioandronico2013 19:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - I've experienced days like the one depicted. Doesn't seem burnt to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 20:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks fine to me. :) --Peulle 06:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 10:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

File:2017-05-09_Jasmin_Ouschan_(re-publica_17)_by_Sandro_Halank–2.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Jasmin Ouschan (Austrian professional pool player) at re:publica 17 --Sandro Halank 10:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose High level of chroma noise, too shallow, not a QI to me, sorry --Poco a poco 10:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 11:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:41, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality --A.Savin 01:51, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco a Poco --Cvmontuy 12:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noisy background and the focus should be on her eyes, not on her nose --PtrQs 23:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 13:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)