Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 21 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Large White Butterfly (Pieris brassicae) -- Alvesgaspar 23:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 00:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaujiena Manor main house. Kruusamägi 20:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI Poco a poco 22:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gaujiena Manor. Kruusamägi 20:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. QI for me --Hubertl 00:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restaurant „Zum Goldenen Lamm“ --F. Riedelio 19:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Code 19:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former bunker of the Atlantic wall with graffitis, la Grande Côte, Saint-Palais-sur-Mer, Charente-Maritime, France. --JLPC 16:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 16:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Leccinum scabrum --Holleday 14:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 16:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entoloma Griseocyaneum --Holleday 14:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mural Puente sobre El Lago de Maracaibo y Rayo del Catatumbo --Rjcastillo 14:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination History trail in the Psyrtskha river gorge. New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 13:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose overexposed and blurred --Christian Ferrer 16:39, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination History trail in the Psyrtskha river gorge. New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 13:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose overexposed and blurred --Christian Ferrer 16:40, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Railway station and railway kilometer sign. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. --Halavar 13:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok, but the sign is the main subject, can you improve a bit the description? I already added 2 categories. --Christian Ferrer 16:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Done Ok. It's done. --Halavar 17:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dragonfly Sympetrum striolatumi to Parc de la Tete d'Or in Lyon, Rhône, France. --Medium69 12:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline for Below minimum size requirement! --Rjcastillo 13:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New house in Zieleniec --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Left crop improvable Poco a poco 11:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 18:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 2 --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boguszów Chapel in Mielec 4 --Jacek Halicki 10:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --JLPC 16:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Figures at Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna --Hubertl 09:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
It looks a bit dark IMO Poco a poco 11:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Done, Poco a poco. It was not the best day, it´s just grey and drab in Vienna since almost one month. I tested the Wikimedia lens for supposed damages. As we can see, everything is ok. --Hubertl 15:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Clear, the dull light is the evidence of lots of clouds, still, better now to me --Poco a poco 21:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Figures at Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna --Hubertl 09:31, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Helsinki, Road Sign --Ralf Roletschek 09:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I added cats and description, good quality. --Poco a poco 11:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC))
-
- Nomination The upper Fusine lake, Fusine di Valroma, Tarvisio, Friuli --Hubertl 08:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Oppose Sorry, very nice motif, good composition, colours and so, but the left and right side of the images is blurred. Problem with the lens probably. --Halavar 13:46, 18 December 2014 (UTC)* thanks, Halavar, you are right. 10mm, together with (wrong) f/5.6 shows this limits, even when it is not a cheap lens.--Hubertl 15:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waterloo Millennium Pier. Mattbuck 07:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hole of Horcum. Mattbuck 07:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 16:57, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nikulasargja canyon, Þingvellir National Park, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 07:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 07:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Elliðaey island, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 07:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Storhofthi, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 07:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reynisfjara, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 07:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:49, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Claude Issorat, Disabled sportpeople, 3rd of marathon de Toulouse 2014 in the arrival zone --PierreSelim 07:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tamparuli, Sabah: SM Advent Tamparuli (Sabah Adventist Secondary School) --Cccefalon 06:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tambulian, Kota Belud, Sabah: Heritage house project. The traditional houses are located on the green, opposite of SK Tambulian. --Cccefalon 06:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 06:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kg. Tamalang, Kudat, Sabah: Basel Christian Church Malaysia (BCCM) Tamalang --Cccefalon 06:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 06:32, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vineyards. Prades-le-Lez, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Cccefalon 06:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vineyards in the Domaine départemental de Restinclières. France. --Christian Ferrer 05:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cliffs of Heimaey, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 05:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mushrooms in decline. Location, The Famberhorst. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
--Famberhorst 05:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Cccefalon 05:49, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Mushrooms in decline. Location, The Famberhorst. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
-
- Nomination Information panel at Putt Nederhorst.
--Famberhorst 05:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion The background seems a bit yellow --Christian Ferrer 06:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Done Small correction. Thank you.--Famberhorst 06:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 12:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Information panel at Putt Nederhorst.
-
- Nomination Christmas market at the Kiepenkerl, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sarracenia purpurea --Ram-Man 03:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 05:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transport in São Paulo --The Photographer 13:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
I will promote once you improve description (add name of the road and Bus model).--C messier 16:20, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Done --The Photographer 17:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support QI. --C messier 14:39, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Transport in São Paulo --The Photographer 13:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crocodylidae in São Paulo Zoo --The Photographer 13:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion QI, but, why so small? --Poco a poco 18:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
I dont remember, maybe some noise or problem in full size, let me search the raw file and upload it to commonsarchive --The Photographer 20:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lonely willow (Salix) to cycle to Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). East.
--Famberhorst 05:45, 17 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Lonely willow (Salix) to cycle to Langweerderwielen (Langwarder Wielen). East.
-
- Nomination Gates of Anna churchyard. Kruusamägi 01:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Insufficient quality. Really, I am sorry. --Hubertl 10:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Support What's wrong with the quality, Hubertl? I think it's all in all sufficient for QI. Maybe it's not completely sharp at 100% but considering the resolution it should be ok IMO. --Code 13:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Oppose It is not only unsharp, the upper part of the tree is posterized. I made an annotation to get you focussed on the problem. --Cccefalon 13:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Ok, you're right. I didn't see that. --Code 14:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Postal service building, Gniezno, Poland. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 11:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 21:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bathroom with a rounded shower. --Medium69 02:17, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Please apply perspective correction. --Cccefalon 06:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Done--Medium69 10:25, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Still not rectilinear and crop is too tight now. I am sorry, but this image wont achieve QI status. --Cccefalon 08:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paide Castle at night. Kruusamägi 01:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Blown out areas, magenta CA, perspective issues etc. Not a QI. --Cccefalon 08:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view of São Paulo city center --The Photographer 20:30, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Amazing, ignoring the "prefetura" inscription and the Brasil flag. –Be..anyone 05:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Circo Massimo seen from Palatine hill --Livioandronico2013 08:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Lighting issue, the half bottom seems too dark than the upper part --Christian Ferrer 06:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eurasian Coot (Fulica atra), Nymphenburg Palace, Munich, Germany. By User:Poco a poco --Christian Ferrer 06:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 18:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Office building of the Westdeutsche Lotterie, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:36, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the peak of Iverian Mountain to the New Athos Monastery. New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia. --Halavar 10:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Lack of contrast, a bit too satured, the subject is a bit overexposed, and CAs at right (see note) --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
I tried to fix the contrast and couldn't. It just looked artificial and overprocessed. Viewing the buildings at 100% indicates heat distortions or excessive noise reduction. Ram-Man 14:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Done New development from RAW using a different software. I think that new version of the image is better, without mentioned flaws. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Good enough now. Ram-Man 18:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination D Stock interior. Mattbuck 07:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Question I dont find any sharp part. Where had you set the focus? --Steindy 18:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
I don't usually look to see what the focus is set to, I just twist until it looks right through the viewfinder. Sharpened. Mattbuck 21:26, 16 December 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Looks good now. Ram-Man 13:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination D Stock interior. Mattbuck 07:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 60163 at Crowcombe Heathfield. Mattbuck 07:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Strong shadows --Christian Ferrer 16:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
This was underexposed, so I uploaded a new version to improve brightness and contrast. Note that the photographer is visible in the reflection. Ram-Man 04:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Support the brightened version is ok --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
That may be a photographer, but it's not the photographer. Mattbuck 00:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Plate_of_Acqua_Claudia_in_Palatino.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Plate of Acqua Claudia in Palatino --Livioandronico2013 22:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Support Good quality. Background very bright, but IMO OK for QI. --XRay 17:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Background overexposed.--Jebulon 21:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is overexposed and has several CAs. --Steindy 12:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Left_side_chapel_of_Santa_Maria_sopra_Minerva.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Left side chapel of Santa Maria sopra Minerva --Livioandronico2013 14:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment IMO the center is too bright.--XRay 06:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Done thanks for review XRay--Livioandronico2013 15:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. It's much better. --XRay 17:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Done thanks for review XRay--Livioandronico2013 15:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo is unevenly illuminated by the flash or welding launcher, which is clearly seen in the paintings. Likewise, the cloth on the altar, where all the details were lost. --Steindy 19:20, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Steindy.--Jebulon 20:50, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Livioandronico2013 14:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Frescoes_of_the_roof_of_the_church_of_Santa_Maria_sopra_Minerva.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Frescoes of the roof of the church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva --Livioandronico2013 13:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Weak Support Good quality. DoF could be better. Light at the right is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 06:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavy disturbing spotlight on the right side. --Steindy 19:20, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Steindy.--Jebulon 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Jebulon 20:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Tunnel_View_Yosemite_August_2013_panorama.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Tunnel View at sunrise. --King of Hearts 06:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Comment HAlf of the image looks only black on my monitor!?--Moroder 00:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Brightened with curves. --King of Hearts 21:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Comment I'd like someone else to review this image --Moroder 18:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Shadows are always strong before the first sun rays, it's widely ok here and the mood is well captured. However I will be tempted to decline for the burned out sky --Christian Ferrer 06:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The sun was already in the sky, visible; I don't think it is possible or even natural for it to not be burned out. --King of Hearts 20:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)Is there the sun on the image? if so I can not make the sun in the sky and if not the sky is overexposed. --Christian Ferrer 21:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Support for me. Mattbuck 22:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC) - Neutral I'm not experienced enough to judge correctly, in any cases, a nice image. :) --Christian Ferrer 05:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Its posterized, the foreground is unnecessarely dark. No QI for me, even when the mood is pleasent. I tried to fix it, with the original raw file it would be possible. --Hubertl 13:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Hubertl. This is just such an extreme dynamic range that nothing works. It might be better as a black and white as the color does nothing for the image. Ram-Man 13:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others, Poco a poco 08:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Livioandronico2013 15:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:141115 Hyogo prefectural Ako Seaside Park Japan19n.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Ako Seaside Park --663highland 09:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Perspective needs to be corrected on the right side. --Cayambe 13:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC) Not done --Christian Ferrer 16:48, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
it dont need any distortion. --Ralf Roletschek 13:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC) - Oppose - the house and the pavillions on the right are leaning. --Óðinn 20:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support works for me. Ram-Man 13:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose perspective not done --Cccefalon 08:56, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Livioandronico2013 15:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Kapelle Mariaberg.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chapel on the hill Mariaberg in Kempten (Allgäu), Germany --CHK46 17:37, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Noticable CA, perspective issues. Mattbuck 21:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Mattbuck , Not done within grace period. --Cccefalon 09:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support it dont need distortion. --Ralf Roletschek 13:23, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose With Mattbuck.--Jebulon 23:07, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Livioandronico2013 15:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Horse December 2014-3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Lusitano horse. Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 18:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Eye fully lost in shadow. --Jkadavoor 17:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes that is true, but is that enough reason for declining? A second opinion, please. Alvesgaspar 10:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Maybe not FP, but definitely QI IMO. --Code 12:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Il n'a pas l'air en bonne santé ton cheval...--Jebulon 21:42, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Je crois qu'il a trôp mangé!... Alvesgaspar 22:25, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Its fixable with LR. I tried it. Would be a pity, if this picture will not QI, only because of this repairable shadow.--Hubertl 15:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment I have no complaints with the horse but the red door is leaning out. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good as is. Ram-Man 13:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Livioandronico2013 15:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Haltern_am_See,_Hullern,_St.-Andreas-Kirche_--_2014_--_3237.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Church of Saint Andreas in Hullern, Haltern am See, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:31, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Sorry ,the church is good but the sky is burn out --Livioandronico2013 09:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Fixed Thanks. Lights in sky are fixed.--XRay 11:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC) - weak support Mmm...i'm not very sure,is better wait for other opinions --Livioandronico2013 14:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- weak support The sky has color distortions that look worse in small thumbnails than at larger magnifications. I normally oppose this type of technical issue. Borderline case for me, but I think just good enough. -- Ram-Man 13:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose. The sky in the original is simply gray without details. There is very slight overexposure, but no disturbing colour change by clipping. Simply light gray, sky sometimes looks like this. Upper right corner has some artifacts by some unsufficiant overpainted disturbing leaves. These errors were massively reinforced by the processing. Also the contrast increase in the sky created completely wrong colours. It is total mystery to me why such a rape is required, performed and then be approved. Weia. -- Smial 01:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC) (i'd support the first version, it's not a great image, but completely acceptable.)
- Fixed Sorry, I assumed it was a cloud top right ... I haven't seen my own correction. Now it's fixed.--XRay 06:44, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Ich würde lieber auf das QI-Bapperl verzichten, statt wegen einiger kurioser Beurteilungen meine Bilder zu verhunzen. -- Smial 10:47, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Ps.: Das Rausstempeln ist jetzt durchaus gelungen.
- Comment Das nehme ich mal mit einem wohlwollenden Lächeln auf. Die Kritik ist sehrwohl meistens - also auch meiner Meinung nach nicht immer - durchaus berechtigt. (Aber du hast recht, in der Vergangenheit gab es schon einmal Bilder, die mir hinterher nicht mehr gefallen haben, auch wenn es nur eine Handvoll war. Das ist aber schon ein paar Wochen her.)--XRay 17:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Ich würde lieber auf das QI-Bapperl verzichten, statt wegen einiger kurioser Beurteilungen meine Bilder zu verhunzen. -- Smial 10:47, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Ps.: Das Rausstempeln ist jetzt durchaus gelungen.
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Livioandronico2013 15:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Shvetsova_Street_SPB_01.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Shvetsova Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 09:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Oppose Left crop should be improved IMHO (get rid of the piece of car and scaffolding) Poco a poco 14:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think it's a big problem (symmetry would be broken). --Florstein 17:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- What about cropping both sides? (see note with proposal) Poco a poco 18:36, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- А можно и просто с левой стороны фото обрезать - по мне симметрия не столь важна для QI (снимают же улицы несимметрично). en: I think we can crop the photo only on the left side; for me, symmetry is not the main factor for QI. --Brateevsky 11:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Brateevsky, мне бы хотелось сохранить и симметрию, и детали. У меня иногда при съёмке улиц (и станций метро) присутствует симметрия как фишка, так что в данном случае это важно. I'd wanted to keep the symmetry (as a shtick), saving maximum of details. May be let's ask the society (is scaffolding so dreadful)? --Florstein 20:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- А можно и просто с левой стороны фото обрезать - по мне симметрия не столь важна для QI (снимают же улицы несимметрично). en: I think we can crop the photo only on the left side; for me, symmetry is not the main factor for QI. --Brateevsky 11:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- What about cropping both sides? (see note with proposal) Poco a poco 18:36, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think it's a big problem (symmetry would be broken). --Florstein 17:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support not very disturbing --Christian Ferrer 20:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support crop would be better, but it's not critical for a QI. Ram-Man 13:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Livioandronico2013 15:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)