Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 14:01:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
- Info Ten years ago, the line one of the subway show the labor reality of Sao Paulo. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:49:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places#Architecture#Exteriors
- Info Wiki Loves Monuments contest participant. Created - uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко - nominated by FBilula -- FBilula (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It feels slightly tilted to me, but I like it and would vote for it if this is fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:49:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
- Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info Dear Jacek, I think that the gallery of historical events is more suitable for this photo. Therefore I took the liberty to change the gallery link: .../Historical#2020-now. Serdecznie pozdrawiam, -- Radomianin (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Again, great composition. Agree with Radomianin re. gallery Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 13:14:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Poland
- Info created by Jacek Halicki - -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link with the parameter #Poland. Pozdrawiam, -- Radomianin (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – A train on the overpass would have been nice. —Bruce1eetalk 14:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool drone photography, maybe not the best light but great composition makes up for it. Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 09:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
- Info Externsteine, seen from the west. Re-shooting this view from the west like File:Externsteine 2 1900.jpg is difficult these days because the bank is heavily overgrown. To take this shot I had to climb down to the pond and balance on a tree trunk lying in the water. All by me.-- Milseburg (talk) 09:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 09:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wasn't sure at first but the composition has grown on me the longer I look at it Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2024 at 00:07:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
- Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link: /Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment thank you!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Tomascastelazo Idea is good, and water waves make it. I tried a bit croped in bottom and in BW version. Its much better. I can put Alt if so. --Mile (talk) 12:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment by all means!!! Thanks!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I think it's a cool composition but unsure if the image quality + level of detail is quite FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 20:50:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
- Info The Sundering of Elves and names given to their divisions. Created by Agnaton - uploaded by Agnaton - nominated by Agnaton -- Agnaton (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: The divisions of elves in Tolkien's works are a very complex matter. This diagram organizes practically all the knowledge in this area and presents it in the most accessible way possible. This image has also previously been assessed using the Quality image guidelines and is considered a Quality image.
- Support -- Agnaton (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment As of 18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC), there is a typo above "NANDOR": "le" should probably be "led". Also, using an image for something that's essentially a text table doesn't seem the best choice in terms of accessibility (searchability, text-to-speech, …). 217.9.50.231 18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow so it is possible to search and select text inside the image when opened as SVG in a modern browser. So it's not as unsearchable as I had wrongly presumed. 217.9.50.231 18:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's "left", some conversion issues. Corrected it :) Agnaton (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow so it is possible to search and select text inside the image when opened as SVG in a modern browser. So it's not as unsearchable as I had wrongly presumed. 217.9.50.231 18:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Thank you for providing this informative table. However, I believe that a FP should not be something that can be completed in just two minutes. Additionally, I noticed some errors in the text. Thank you for your understanding --Wilfredor (talk) 13:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I wonder if this would do better on the FPC project on English Wikipedia than here. FPC on ENWiki tends to put more emphasis on 'encyclopedic value' and may be more likely to favour a very important and useful illustration that adds a lot to an article but doesn't necessarily have the immediate 'wow-factor.' Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I realize that this kind of thing takes a lot of time and effort to research and organize into a nice structure, It's very well made, I just hesitate to support because it's not really a 'picture' Henrysz (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2024 at 11:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose All of those tents and garbage bags ruin the impression for me, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- hello dear they are not garbage : they are cans for waters and tools to challenge a long hiking in the Tassili n'Ajjer plateau. It is a camp view. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose For a camping view, this is too dark, and for the natural scenery, camping equipment is in the way. --Tmv (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination thank you all i ll do better next time IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 19:40:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
- Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool textures Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quite an interesting pattern but otherwise nothing special for me.--Ermell (talk) 07:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 18:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Egypt
- Info created by Mona Abo-Abda - uploaded by Mona Abo-Abda - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose This is a well composed photo but it's a little noisy and I'm not sure I like black and white here. Cmao20 (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Black & white fits very well with the architecture style. Yann (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Denoised version proposed Dear author Mona Abo-Abda, dear reviewers @Henrysz, Cmao20, and Yann: I have taken the liberty of moderately denoising the photo to rescue the nomination. In my opinion, it's an eye-catching capture and it would be a pity if the nomination fails due to technical quality issues. If you are convinced by the edit, please feel free to use the suggested file for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternate version (denoised)
[edit]- Support OK I hope I did this right, thank you Radomianin -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the denoised alternative. An impressive interior scene, the black and white stylistic technique highlights the lines in the composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 18:27:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the Curchi Monastery, Curchi, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support But a HDR in this case should be better --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The only down side is the light reflection in the middle, but how this could be avoided? Yann (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 18:13:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by NASA - uploaded by BotMultichillT - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool, but the image description could do with some work to tell us more about what we're looking at here Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tmv (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 13:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Great composition and lovely to get a mating pair but I'm not fully convinced by the sharpness. I appreciate you've provided a very high resolution file which is great. I made this downsample which is 9.4 megapixels and is mainly sharp, so on that basis I think it's okay. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- thanks for your valuable comment Anitava Roy (talk) 16:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 12:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support In spite of various CAs, it is interesting and different enough that I think it can be FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find the union between an old church and improvised modern chairs interestingly strange, I always thought that this should be done for the comfort of people. We also have few outstanding photos of churches from Latin America compared to the high density of outstanding ones from Europe, the low representativeness of these areas also makes me vote for this photo. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 12:04:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nymphaeaceae
- Info created and uploaded by Bilby - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Could be sharper but it's a nice composition and I like that it's almost high-key Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A nice three dimensional feel to it Henrysz (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Uncalibrated color space and F-number missing ...but Support --Laitche (talk) 20:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:072 Vieillot's black weaver building the start of a nest at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 11:14:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nothing special as thumb, but when full it reminds me on joga-stretching. A bit funny composition and QI good. --Mile (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 08:58:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#Cartoon
- Info created by Bernhard Gillam (1856-1896) in 1882, and published in the humor magazine Puck after President Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act. Uploaded and nominated by Peulle -- Peulle (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Peulle (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, and interesting with the header. I would add a little bit more light. Yann (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great reproduction. Cmao20 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 07:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Sweden
- Info Årstabroarna are two parallel railway viaducts in central Stockholm, Sweden, passing over the watercourse of Årstaviken and the islets Årsta holmar, they connect the major island Södermalm to the southern mainland district Årsta. The eastern bridge (left), the older of the two and still often referred to as Årstabron ("The Årsta Bridge"), is still in operation almost 100 years after its inauguration in 1929. The bridge, on its completion the longest bridge in Sweden, was designed be the architect Cyrillus Johansson. A western bridge (built for commuter train), designed by Sir Norman Foster, was finally inaugurated in 2005. For transparency: generativ AI was used to remove some small lens flares
- Created, uploaded and nominated by --ArildV (talk) 07:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)ArildV
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very eye-catching composition, nice light. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 11:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great mood Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. Very nice. --XRay 💬 17:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 04:51:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Family Ranunculales
- Info Empty seed pod of a monkshood (Aconitum) in decay. Focus stack of 30 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very sharp and interesting photo Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Delias pasithoe (Linnaeus, 1767)-Red-base Jezebel.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 04:29:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice. I can't find any FPs of this species. Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 22:47:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Morning view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Placid and tranquil, good light, great image quality. I might crop a tiny bit of the sky so there's the same amount of room above the tree as below the reflection. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info New version uploaded (Brighten + Crop change) --Laitche (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 12:45:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Games
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 12:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I feel like there is a bit more white space on the right than the left, maybe worth checking. Great photo. Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. I think that it is also necessary to create a more appropriate category in FP Wilfredor (talk) 13:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 'Objects#Games', perhaps. The dice, the cricket ball and the billiards from the current gallery subsection could also go into there. Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and created this, if someone disagrees with me they can revert. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- This makes me think, is this a game or a sport? Wilfredor (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and created this, if someone disagrees with me they can revert. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's White's turn? Right? Wolverine XI 19:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Non, it’s Black's turn, and the best move is Nxe4 (Knight takes e4). This move allows Black to control the center, black sacrifices the e4 pawn temporarily (romantically) to gain activity and piece coordination. This tactic was used by Paul Morphy, particularly in his famous 1858 game against Duke Karl Wilfredor (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 00:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 11:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and beautiful butterfly Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unlike what we're used to seeing, I would have preferred a lower-angle shot (worm's-eye view), but you can't have everything in life. The reflection and the contrast between the delicate elements and the mud make this photo worthy of being a Featured Photo. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 10:39:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Info En-Vau calanque, Calanques National Park, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France. No existing FPs. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Super high resolution and satisfying composition, spectacular view. Strong candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif is outstanding, but technical quality is below the FP-bar in my eyes. The overexposed clouds are large and disturbing. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the clouds to the left, as pointed by Milseburg above, are overexposed. Wolverine XI 20:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Milseburg. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great motif, and quality is ok for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternate version
[edit]- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Info Alternate version without the clouds.
- Support —kallerna (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is a different picture, not an alternate version of the nomination above. Please nominate it separately. Yann (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I much prefer the original. This tighter composition doesn't really work for me. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Me too --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 09:08:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
- Info Red helleborine (Cephalanthera rubra), found on Ulrichsberg mountain, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Utagawa Yoshikazu - 亜墨利加國蒸気車往來 (The Comings and Goings of an American Steamship) (1861).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 00:24:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
- Info Interesting example of yokohama-e, works of ukiyo-e depicting non-Japanese that emerged following the opening of Yokohama to foreigners. Created by Utagawa Yoshikazu - uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:29:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Thailand
- Info High resolution, sharp photo of interesting place with beautiful light + colours. No FPs of this place, and this is the only QI. created by BigDom - uploaded by BigDom - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
Good but some edit could be done, anoted.--Mile (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mile You have a keen eye. I'm going to say the spots/streaks were insects, there were quite a few down there by the river. I have removed the ones you noted plus a couple more that the spot visualiser highlighted. Thanks, BigDom (talk) 10:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nomination! BigDom (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good. --Mile (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created by Shougissime - uploaded by Shougissime - nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Would reframing this to avoid the flag/banner help? I see that the exposure is a bit high (highlights on helmet), but not to the point that I'd oppose. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment How about this composition? --Laitche (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per above crop. Would support. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
NeutralI'd support a version that crops out that corner of the banner, because apart from that I think this is a good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, great. Cmao20 (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You're right, I cropped as per Mile proposal and reduce highlight on helmet to recover some details. --Shougissime (talk) 16:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Much better. Thank you. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lucky to get this path of cycler, angle was not so changed, otherwise i would never catch them bellow 1/800. If they would go more tangent even faster than that. --Mile (talk) 17:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 23:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the cropped version. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 17:34:13
- Info It is rare that I nominate an image for delisting but this one struck me in the category as obviously well below the standard. Not even 3 megapixels for a very common bird and nothing is really sharp, IMO not QI let alone FP. Barely passed in 2007. Also downsampled to make it appear sharper (see original nomination) which is against guidelines. I will soon nominate this as a replacement. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. BigDom (talk) 00:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Thi (talk) 10:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --Peulle (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Harlock81 (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Cayambe (talk) 06:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 13:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info [Valadier] (Giuseppe) was a neoclassicist architect and designer and urban planner in Italy. Looking at the list of his works, there is not a work by Valadier that is not simply gorgeous. This is the Cathedral of Urbino's dome (1789-1810). Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could find some minor mistakes, but if this could be some MB less would be even better - hard to open. --Mile (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Minor issues fixed (e.g. stitching errors) and 10% file size reduction. Thanks for your remarks. Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 11:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great, interesting motif but IMO too noisy (EXIF data indicates ISO 5000, would explain why) and I don't like the fact that it seems to have been pasted onto a plain white background, I'd prefer a more natural or gradient background Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I assume these settings were used as the museum didn't allow a tripod? Anyway, as Cmao20 says the result is too noisy for FP. Some of the white parts of the design also seem blown out and have no detail left. BigDom (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
- Info all by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by unknown photographer from the Auschwitz Erkennungsdienst, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info "Selection" of Hungarian Jews on the ramp at Auschwitz-II-Birkenau in German-occupied Poland, May/June 1944, during the final phase of the Holocaust. Jews were sent either to work or to the gas chamber. The photograph is part of the collection known as the Auschwitz Album, which was donated to Yad Vashem by Lili Jacob, a survivor, who found it in the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp in 1945. See Auschwitz Album, Yad Vashem: "The Auschwitz Album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process leading to mass murder at Auschwitz-Birkenau."
- Support Historical image with high educational value, restored. FP on English Wikipedia. -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a very important testimony that should be promoted because of its significance to contemporary history. The technical quality should be disregarded in view of its significance. In the last 15 years I have visited Auschwitz and Birkenau several times and have studied the dark German history intensively. It is important to keep the memory alive in order to pass on the lessons to future generations. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to look at, but that's why we should look at it Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – A disturbing, but important photograph. —Bruce1eetalk 13:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above... ... --Terragio67 (talk) 14:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 09:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Morocco
- Info Ksar Aït Benhaddou, Marocco (أيت بن حدو، المغرب). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition + colours Cmao20 (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tmv (talk) 13:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great vibrance and composition. Terragio67 (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Your shot is a beautiful shot.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have taken the liberty of refining the gallery link with the parameter #Morocco. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment OK Radomianin, i saw before its not there yet, wanted to put when it passed but supose it will so thanx. --Mile (talk) 09:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message, Mile. You are right, the section did not exist before. But since it is foreseeable that this nomination will be successful, I created the section. This will make it easier to maintain after the nomination is over. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 02:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is IMO spoiled a bit by the line of bottles along the bottom Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote. The partially cut bottles enhance the cultural context, as cachaça is typically consumed at Brazilian barbecues, adding depth to the narrative without distracting from the main focus. I initially considered removing them, but a store employee told me not to, so I chose to respect their placement to reflect the authentic supermarket environment Wilfredor (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the feedback --Wilfredor (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 00:31:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely facade and nostalgic 80s look. The slope of the street not only causes discomfort, but also inevitably draws my gaze to the white line and the dirt accumulated on the pavement. Despite the many eye-catching elements of the facade, the place fails to stand out against the visual distractions of the building behind it. However, what really makes feel bad is the complete absence of people at the entrance, giving the impression of a place abandoned or on the verge of closing. Additionally, the crooked white sign on the right distracts. In summary, many elements, but none strong enough. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good selfportrait Frank, i would support if you clean a bit of CA. Annoted. --Mile (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- CA correction was turned on during the development; I don't see any in the uploaded file. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good picture (but is it me or is it tilted?) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- In order to avoid tilt, I routinely use the level on the back screen of my camera. I also double-ckecked for tilt after running a perspective correction on Capture One (which is usually pretty precise). The slight slope of the street and the white centerline might cause this impression. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's what I thought, thank you for the clarification! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- In order to avoid tilt, I routinely use the level on the back screen of my camera. I also double-ckecked for tilt after running a perspective correction on Capture One (which is usually pretty precise). The slight slope of the street and the white centerline might cause this impression. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Anyway. --Mile (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 18:37:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Italy
- Info Mesola Castle is one of the 19 prestigious residences of the [Este] family, also called Delizie degli Este (Este's delights). It is located in the municipality of [Mesola] in the province of Ferrara, in the north-eastern part of Italy. To all intents and purposes it is a fortified palace, difficult to photograph due to the almost never cooperative light, with imposing dimensions for the small town that hosts it. it is almost 25 meters high with a square architectural layout with four crenellated square towers at the corners. I assure you that the amazement of having this building in front of you was certainly greater than this photo. C. U. N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing! Nice light, good image quality, superb resolution, and satisfying composition. Cmao20 (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Quality is superb, but the castle itself looks distorted and unnatural due to perspective correction. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose More pic you put into panorama harder is to solve lines, especially looking upward. Why dont you put some angle and make it more natural. --Mile (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative three points perspective version
[edit]- Info According to @Екатерина Борисова and @Mile remarks, I decided to create a new thre points perspective version. @Cmao20 and @Radomianin , please, I kindly ask you again to check and evaluate this new version too. Thank you all. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't really care that much about perspective correction in an example like this, as long as consistent and symmetrical. Both approaches have advantages and drawbacks. Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Regarding the first version, I admit that the optical effect seems exaggerated at first glance, but the geometric shape shows almost straight lines after perspective correction. Nevertheless, I find the wider version more pleasing in its composition than the alternative. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think beter, at least not loking as flower. If subject went to much high some middle lane perhaps help. Suppose crop also help. --Mile (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one looks better, The top photo seems a bit too steep.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 17:57:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
- Info No FPs of this picturesque and well-known place. Bit of noise on the hills but I don't mind when the composition and light are this good. created by Elpi77 - uploaded by Elpi77 - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I miss coordinates and EXIF data. Not sure whether it's a drone photo. If it is, it should be categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support But see comment from A.Savin.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I added coordinates, but there's not a lot I can do about EXIF. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your effort.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, how do you come to this geolocation? Either the photographer was standing on the ground -- but then, looking at Google streetview, I don't think this location is correct (see the slopes at the left). Or this is indeed an aerial/drone shot -- but then not only this location is possible and without EXIF and response from the photographer we never can be sure, right? --A.Savin 22:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure that the houses in the picture are located in a place named Rivaz 15 kilometers North from Lausanne. The car park depicted is next to the Centrale Hidroelectrique le Forestay. According to the panorama's background, the camera location is compatibile with a place named Forestay, located in the south part of Chexbres, maybe, Chemin de la Plantaz. Can you double check, please? Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did almost exactly the same photo a few years ago with same lighting, same time of the day and of the year and exact same place (but with more snow on the mountains) and I can confirm it's Rivaz and that this picture can only be taken with a drone -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't question the town in the picture. It's more about precise camera location: if there's no EXIF data and we cannot expect a statement from the photographer, then we can only estimate: use {{Location estimated}}. --A.Savin 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Camera location appearing on the file right now is wrong (46° 28′ 27.27″ N, 6° 47′ 38.71″ E) and suggesting it would be Saint-Saphorin, which is not the case (it's Rivaz). Right camera (drone) location with only 10-20m margin error is 46°28'38.0"N 6°46'36.4"E -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, now that makes sense IMO, thanks. Support --A.Savin 16:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Camera location appearing on the file right now is wrong (46° 28′ 27.27″ N, 6° 47′ 38.71″ E) and suggesting it would be Saint-Saphorin, which is not the case (it's Rivaz). Right camera (drone) location with only 10-20m margin error is 46°28'38.0"N 6°46'36.4"E -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't question the town in the picture. It's more about precise camera location: if there's no EXIF data and we cannot expect a statement from the photographer, then we can only estimate: use {{Location estimated}}. --A.Savin 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did almost exactly the same photo a few years ago with same lighting, same time of the day and of the year and exact same place (but with more snow on the mountains) and I can confirm it's Rivaz and that this picture can only be taken with a drone -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure that the houses in the picture are located in a place named Rivaz 15 kilometers North from Lausanne. The car park depicted is next to the Centrale Hidroelectrique le Forestay. According to the panorama's background, the camera location is compatibile with a place named Forestay, located in the south part of Chexbres, maybe, Chemin de la Plantaz. Can you double check, please? Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 14:35:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by GTC, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution of a poster of the 1900 Paris World Fair. -- Yann (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool, I can't view it in full size but it looks very sharp at 6000px across. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 13:11:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main nave of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, as usual Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 15:44:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment why f/2,5? Ezarateesteban 19:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1) Perspective issues. All the buildings are leaning to the left. The middle building very heavily (check the clock tower). 2) The detail/compression is like from a smartphone. I have checked the camera from EXIF and surely it can produce much better quality ;-) --Lynx1211 (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice light and composition, very warm and inviting. Agree perspective correction could be better and level of detail is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternate version (rotation)
[edit]- Support Rotation done. I understand about the quality, I didn't have a tripod. Gzen92 (talk) 09:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 04:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good technical rendition and certainly QI, but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per GRDN711. -- Karelj (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with GRDN711, sorry. Maybe a more interesting sky and/or a long exposure to smooth out the water would take this to the next level? BigDom (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
File:NASA-Apollo8-Dec24-Earthrise.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 22:04:57
- Info Much better copy: higher resolution, better colors, less compression, etc. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Delist and replace--Zzzs (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per below. I now believe historical photos are superior to edited versions because they're, well, the original copy. --Zzzs (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Terragio67 (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, I like the colors of the existing file, but the others’ comments are too numerous not to be convincing. - Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 10:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep With a picture like 'Earthrise' that has gained so much of its value from its iconic status, it is IMO appropriate to feature the version of it that is most similar to the 'famous' version, as opposed to a version that may be of higher technical quality. The proposed replacement is clearly a better quality image but if we want to feature a good quality photo of the Earth above the lunar surface, we shouldn't feature this image at all because it has long been superseded by photos from new space probes. Its value comes from its historical and cultural importance, not its technical quality. The iconic version of the picture, the one used by most sources including NASA themselves, is the current FP, and so that is the one we should feature. See also 1, 2, 3. 16:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Cmao20 (talk)
- Keep I agree with Cmao20. --FreCha (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The two pictures are two different things, even though they reproduce the same data. The older one has an historical value. It has been reproduced as such on newspapers, books, stamps, etc.: en:Earthrise. The newer one shows a more realistic version of the other, as "it had must be" if all colours would had been well balanced. There is a lot of technical job behind, and it has also a very important value, but mainly in the comparison with the other one. According to me, the newer one deserves to be enlisted among the featured picture, but not in substitution of the other one. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 21:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and attractively lit photo of interesting architecture. Sky is pretty bland, would be better still with a more interesting sky. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice shot and looks like best available photo of this theater so far, but still I miss some more wow for an FP. --A.Savin 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Morocco
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support The corner at the bottom ... :-( --XRay 💬 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @XRay, Cmao20 If you ask me, i would put even a bit higher. Bottom nothing while above nice crafting. Lost complete V, but... --Mile (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I've taken the liberty of refining the gallery link with the parameter #Morocco. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version is a considerable improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
* Weak support Agree with Cmao20... --Terragio67 (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well done, Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The haze makes the scene a bit too soft, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 10:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)