Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Hopetoun falls.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2009 at 10:51:31
Info Reason to delist (Original nomination): Waterfall shots are a dime a dozen these days, and since this one has only 1.3 Mpx, there is no reason to keep it Featured.
Delist As nominator. -- JovanCormac 10:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)- Delist —kallerna™ 12:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep Very nice image! --Karel (talk) 13:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)- Keep author is still active so perhaps he can upload a bigger version.--Avala (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Damnit, this is making me furious! Would you please vote on the picture at hand, and not on possible higher resolution versions that may surface one day? -- JovanCormac 15:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Why make things complicated and go through a delisting and then repromoting the photo process, if we can get things done in one day like with Himalayas photo?--Avala (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Jovan, when I'm only a quick msg on a talk page away, it's not hard to ask me for a higher resolution image rather than delist and ask questions later. :-) Diliff (talk) 19:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Like I said, I always deal with the pictures at hand. I appreciate that you have uploaded a higher res version, but the one I nominated had low res. To be honest, I try to not look at who took a picture when delisting, for fear that could bias me in some way. In this case, had I seen your name, I probably would have been too intimidated to delist at all... ;-) -- JovanCormac 05:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Damnit, this is making me furious! Would you please vote on the picture at hand, and not on possible higher resolution versions that may surface one day? -- JovanCormac 15:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Uploaded original version at 3072x2048 resolution. Quality is not great by current standards, but I think this still just scrapes through. I think it's a slightly more interesting and aesthetic waterfall image than most. Diliff (talk) 19:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep A great image. Also I am more inclined to keep early images using this technique rather than the 'dime a dozen' copy cats :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
- Higher resolution version uploaded. Thank you, David! -- JovanCormac 05:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, but the last thing I would want is you to be intimidated away from your opinion! I accept that this is no longer one of my better images. I like the composition though. I'd love to go back and shoot it with a bit more care and attention sometime. :-) I'd be the first to nominate this for delisting if and when I do. Diliff (talk) 13:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
