Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Yellow woolly bear caterpillar.jpg

Image:Yellow_woolly_bear_caterpillar.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by DonES - uploaded by DonES - nominated by DonES 01:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Please forgive the narrow DOF. --DonES 01:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --> I think this is the caterpillar of the Spotted tussock moth (Lophocampa maculata). Yellow woolly bear caterpillars (Spilosoma virginica) are all yellow. I might be wrong. Might need a filename change? Snowwayout 01:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

•  Comment I think you're right. I tried to ID it myself based on the woolly bear caterpillar, which looks quite similar, but has an orange band. How do I go about renaming the image? DonES 04:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• See FAQ but its a bit of a pain. Snowwayout 08:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• I've uploaded the correct image here. Image:Lophocampa maculata caterpillar.jpg. Do I re-nominate? --DonES 04:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

•  Neutral I don't like the central composition. Anyway good pic, but not FP-quality, IMO. Maybe if it was cropped a bit or something... --Erina 15:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support good depth and details. background fills the space but is not disturbing --Jollyroger 14:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support. I like the documentary-style composition and the cute subject. TheBernFiles 15:43, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Boereck 09:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose composition--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 00:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Lycaon 05:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not even the caterpillar itself is all sharp, let alone its environment. The composition is a bit boring and the background somewhat disturbing. Altogether the picture misses FP-quality. Roger McLassus 15:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 06:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)