Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tiger - melbourne zoo.jpg

Info Uploaded and nominated by Fir0002 (self nom)
Support --Fir0002 www 00:41, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Selfnomination should not be allowed here. --SvonHalenbach 00:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They should be allowed, just not excessively --Digon3 03:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Digon3, the F in FP stands for Featured, not for Fir0002. ;-) -- Lycaon 07:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Image cluttered, crop too tight , distracting foreground and background. Quite far form FP standards, although the image of the tiger is clear and sharp. Alvesgaspar 08:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well in the composition of this image I tried to incorporate the surroundings as much as possible to make it look natural --Fir0002 www 10:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar.--MichaelMaggs 10:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the background is too bright and then, too disctractive. Cyril 10:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral actually i like the tiger with that background...it shows how well the tiger is hidden in such surroundings.--AngMoKio 13:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with AngMoKio -- Lerdsuwa 15:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop – flamurai 18:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I usually don't like zoo pics and vote against them, but in this one, there's nothing to indicate that it is in a zoo, no human artefacts, and the vegetation isn't visibly trampled by the cage inhabitant(s). This pic could have been in natural conditions, only the honesty of the photographer to show otherwise. - MPF 21:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Evalutieambtenaar 11:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support ack MPF --Ikiwaner 18:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too messy with all branches and leaves, even if that might be natural I would prefer a more clean image. /Daniel78 23:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ansett 12:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tbc 17:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pjotr 18:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

5 support, 1 neutral, 9 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 23:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu