Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sveti Nikola.jpg

Info created by Tone — uploaded by Tone — nominated by Tone
Support, I wonder if it would be better to cut the upper and lower part. Tone 18:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think cropping would definitely be in order. Also, the colours look a bit dim to me. (I understand, however, the icon might have been in shadow.) QuartierLatin1968 19:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Jollyroger 20:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - nice pic, but needs more info for context - where is the monastery, what size (10 cm? 1 m? 3 m? - it could be anything!) and position (plate? wall? floor?) is the mural? - MPF 22:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the info on the image's site. Is it ok or would you like any more details? Regards. --Tone 22:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's ideal, thanks! Changed vote to support - MPF 23:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Janeznovak 06:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Eleassar ^{my talk} 11:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice light, but it isn't the photo that I like, it's the painting. It's no compesition at all, just a painting.Moralist 16:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- So what? I think the painting (BTW it's rather some kind of mosaic, not a painting) makes the photo valuable enough. Support --Erina 16:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Terrible. Underexposed. --Olei 23:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Should be cropped on top and bottom. Lighting and colours are not impressive. Given how easy it is to take a photo of such an object, it could be much better. By the way - it is not a painting but a mosaic. Roger McLassus 10:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Boereck 09:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 09:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu