Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Soapbubbles-SteveEF.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Soapbubbles-SteveEF.jpg - not featured
[edit]
- From Flickr,
Nominate
by pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Support I think it's really well done, without being trite or too cute -- right down to her dirty hands. pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Oppose The subject of the picture, the soap bubbles, are all extremely blurred. MGo 12:01, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Comment If I thought that the bubbles were the main subject then I would also have voted oppose. pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support I like it. I agree that the girl is the subject, not the bubbles. NPPyzixBlan 17:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Ss181292 20:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC) If that bubbles are not the main subject, the picture is worthless.
- Support - Composition is very good -- Fabien1309 20:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Neutrality 22:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Good, but not enough to be featured. El Comandante 23:52, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support MartinD 11:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose nice, but although the girl is the subject, blurred bubbles look weird to me. --che 13:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Neutral i wish the bubbles were in focus. --Nvineeth 07:55, 14 April 2006 (UTC)- Support Rex 22:44, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support Maybe it would be better with bubbles within DoF, and may be not. It's a great shot anyway. Francisco M. Marzoa 05:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Wing-Chi 17:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support as per Pfctdayelise. Thryduulf 09:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Friday 12:38, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose blurred bubbles - MPF 22:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support almost too cutesy, but I'll support -Quasipalm 15:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
9 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral --> not featured Roger McLassus 17:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
