Oppose Sorry but this would have been much better shot from the other side of the aircraft so that it wasn't in shadow. Plus the wingtip is clipped Mfield16:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment When I say excellent composition I mean that ist's shot contre jour and you still see details in the shadow. I think the picture would be boring when shot from the other side. --Ikiwaner17:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It looks to me like a snapshot that is being justified from this side because the photographer didn't have permission didn't have permission to walk around the other side. If doesn't feel like a shot that was deliberately taken contre jour. It's a weak justification for a boring underexposed snapshot of an aircraft with one wing clipped off. Sorry if it sounds harsh but this is not FP material. Mfield19:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support In this case the shadowside is the better solution. The reflection would be to hard on the sunside. --Niabot19:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think the snow was that blue naturally, rather it was a effect of poor white balance (I could be wrong since I wasn't there of course, but this is a well known photographic effect) Movieevery15:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info created by Markus Bernet - uploaded by Markus Bernet - nominated by Ikiwaner 16:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Support I like this one for its excellent composition and perfect exposure. It makes me feel the cold there. -- Ikiwaner 16:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but this would have been much better shot from the other side of the aircraft so that it wasn't in shadow. Plus the wingtip is clipped Mfield 16:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment When I say excellent composition I mean that ist's shot contre jour and you still see details in the shadow. I think the picture would be boring when shot from the other side. --Ikiwaner 17:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
