Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Salt lake city county bldg.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Salt lake city county bldg.jpg - not featured
[edit]Info created by Talshiarr — uploaded by Talshiarr — nominated by Talshiarr
Neutral Talshiarr 20:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Neutral Wow, good self-nomination! Rare thing. And not supporting-own-work-with-no-real-reason: even more rare. :) Anyway: quality - sure, featured - not. Not interesting enough, IMO. Central composition, and I'd crop it a bit more However it's very good technically. --Erina 22:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I thought it would be a little arrogant for my first submission/nomination to blow my own horn and try to influence people when I'm still learning what makes a FPC :-). I value the opinions of people who've been doing this type of critique for a long period, please pick it apart so I can learn myself. Talshiarr 06:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness and colours are fine, composition is a bit boring and converging lines somewhat disturbing. Altogether not really outstanding. Roger McLassus 10:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Oppose The trees occlude most of the building, especially that green tree on the right ... Basically, only the tower is fully visible, so ... nope, I don't think this should be FP --Leclerc 12:28, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Neutral interesting composition - the trees are an issue but I suspect there isnt a more open view. reshooting and removing the highway sign on the left and the lamp post on the right as well as reducing the foreground road surface would negate some the tree issue as they would become more of an enhancement to the subject rather than a hinderance Gnangarra 16:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment - I did a quick crop/resize to show what I was suggesting Image:800px-Salt lake city county bldg-ed crop.jpg when you have reviewed and FP nomination closed please tag the image for speedy deletion Gnangarra 16:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Oppose I would like it as a Quality Image or Wallpaper, but not FP. --Digon3 17:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Day 7: 0 support, 3 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 06:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)