Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rosa Kolkhoznitsa 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Rosa Kolkhoznitsa 1.jpg -> not featured
[edit]- Nominate and Support James F. (talk) 12:52, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Neutral On the one hand, the flower is really well depicted, hi-res and all. On the other hand, I don't quite like the composition – it makes one big splotch of flower, without seeing more of the stem. David.Monniaux 14:20, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose It's really beautiful. norro 19:51, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose Pixeltoo 12:27, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support. villy ♦ ✎ 08:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Fanghong 01:47, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose- surely we could find a better rose picture. Peregrine981 08:36, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
- Ouch! But there are hundreds in Category:Rosa to choose from, and more to come. Not to toot my own horn too much, but this one is one of the better of the bunch. Stan Shebs 12:08, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
- It is better than most pics, and not bad overall. I just feel that with so many rose pics out there we should set a pretty high standard for this type of photo. This one is not as good as the other one up for nomination, about which I'm more or less neutral. I also feel others such as Image:Rosa Dorola 1.jpg are better than this. The lighting is too stark, and the angle too severe in my opinion. Peregrine981 09:10, 2 May 2005 (UTC)