Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Quiraing Isle of Skye Pano.jpg

Image:Quiraing Isle of Skye Pano.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2011 at 08:04:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Quiraing Isle of Skye Pano.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Quiraing Isle of Skye Pano.jpg

•  Info created by, uploaded by and nominated by -- Ritchyblack (talk) 08:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ritchyblack (talk) 08:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Merops (talk) 09:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support colors looks too artificial to me Good after correction of colours (for me only visible in full size!?) ----Berthold Werner (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The sky appears to have too many shades of blue for what seems to be a partially sunny day. Also how come the clouds do not leave any noticeable shadows on the ground? —stay (sic)! 06:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Info It’s very interesting what some people can read everything from a picture. For the bright colors and different blue in the sky is a polarizing filter responsible. God for the clouds ;-) The colors can i reduced. I’m not going to paint shadows on the ground. --Ritchyblack (talk) 10:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

• I actually like the image too, but something doesn't feel right here. Maybe you've edited or Photoshopped the picture? —stay (sic)! 09:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

• The image is composed and tonal values corrected wiht "Gigapano" and gradation curve edited wiht PS-CS3 and some bad crossings repaired. (Sorry, i do not speak English. I use google translator) --Ritchyblack (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Good photo. Colours ok for Scotland (I presume you did not push them artificially). Some cloud shadows on the ground can be seen indeed. (And no sign of HDR Kitsch). -- KlausFoehl (talk) 10:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support wonderful picture of a beautiful landscape --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support Although I support, I might suggest to drop some strength from the yellow color. I haven't been to Scotland yet, but I believe the yellows are still a bit too strong or saturated aren't they? The use of polarizing filter doesn't bother me this time. --Ximonic (talk) 11:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm removing the weak from my support now when I realized that you've reduced the saturation a little. To me it doesn't look as artificial anymore, and I really hope it is truthfully depicting the reality. But I find it quite good now, thanks. --Ximonic (talk) 18:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The processing makes the colours and contrasts unnatural IMO. --99of9 (talk) 14:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Having been there I can confirm that those colours are a most unatural treatment for the area. The odd thing is that the more natural burnt orange of the ground cover is even more striking! Not sure why the author would feel the need to make the change we see here. Great picture though and I love the lone individual way off in the distance standing near the cliff edge. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Info I have now reduced the yellow and green color saturation and uploaded the new image. Please delete your cache --Ritchyblack (talk) 07:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- H005 21:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support When I go back there and if I find that the ground cover is burnt orange and not yellow I will seek delisting :) Lovely pic. Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:54, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 13:46, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas