Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pseudorasbora parva(edited version).jpg

Image:Pseudorasbora parva(edited version).jpg

Laitche's edit, featured

•  Info created by Seotaro, nominated by -- Laitche 17:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche 17:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I love it. Not often are there good images of fish, and this is a particularly nice one. Majorly (talk) 23:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Dtarazona 23:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the blotchy background (which makes it look painted), and there is apparently a whole editing story preceding this nom, possibly including an almost 200% upscaling. Lycaon 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

• The author insists that the resolution of this image is not expanded. I want to believe him. -- Laitche 05:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

• I'd want to believe that too, but the upload history and quality stages of that image, IMO tell a different story... And yet I can be mistaken... But for sure you could've done a better job on the background ;-). Lycaon 06:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks Lycaon :) -- Laitche 07:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

• Looks as if the resolution was genuine, but the editing was a bit, let's call it unfortunate. I did a new edit from the original. It can be found after this nomination. The potential was there. Lycaon 19:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

•  Support --Thermos 00:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would be disappointed to see this as a POTD. -- carol 01:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Info I fixed a few unnatural background parts and uploaded new version. -- Laitche 07:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Lerdsuwa 10:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- sorry, I don't see any special feature in the picture. --Applebee 17:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis 17:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Exceptional quality for being taken in an aquarium - Ianare 09:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Jon Harald Søby 12:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support maybe a bit oversharpened Tbc 19:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Slaunger 21:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - After much hesitation. But the gorgeous silvery tones make it - Alvesgaspar 21:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice but not excellent --Richard Bartz 22:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect--B.navez 02:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support More power to plain-looking fish. No systemic bias please! Samsara 10:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough. It looks better at full size. RedCoat 11:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support good and very good as illustration in WM projetcs -> fr:Pseudorasbora parva, background could be better, but this picture is F to me. Przykuta 13:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose distracting blotches at close-up. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 14:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Do you mean close-up about background? -- Laitche 17:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Great sharpness, no cause for oppose. --Beyond silence 23:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Please upload/reveal EXIF data to rule out upscaling suspicions. Lycaon 13:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

• EXIF data is available in another versions page. -- Laitche 15:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good image, but nothing special. --Karelj 19:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

result: 16 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 21:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Lycaon's edit

•  InfoNon-blotchy edit, created by Seotaro, edited and nominated by -- Lycaon 13:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lycaon 13:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nominationLycaon 21:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)