Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pronghorn in Yellowstone National Park.jpg

Image:Pronghorn in Yellowstone National Park.jpg, not featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 06:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 06:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Muhammad 11:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Umnik (talk) 14:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Eagle01 (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Vote of blocked user struck. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the composition and the colours. A bit short from a quality point of view too. Benh (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hardly FP material - I don't see what makes it that special. --Laveol (talk) 22:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

• IMO an image of an animal taken in the natural habitat is always special and is always FP material.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose --Teme (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition and lack of wow. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Korax1214 (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Alternative 1, not featured

•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

At full resolution you could see flies at his legs.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose--Teme (talk) 18:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition and lack of wow. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Michael --Reflection of Perfection (talk) 06:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I prefer this one for composition, but the snow on the mountain is red. --S23678 (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

It is because the image was taken very early in the morning and the snow was lit by the direct sun.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

But it was took within 1 minute from the other picture, where the snow is white (5h49 vs 5h50) !?! --S23678 (talk) 13:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Korax1214 (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)