Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Piano hammers.jpg

From stock xchng. — pfctdayelise 00:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support — pfctdayelise 00:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 02:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred - and a 90° counter-clockwise rotation is needed, I think Calderwood 08:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Calderwood, this is obviously an upright piano. Rama 11:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If so, then I was wrong. But this was not an important point anyway. Calderwood 13:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose composition is quite nice, but I don't like the focus position and that it's quite blurred even in its small resolution --SehLax 18:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment piano hammers are covered in felt, so they would look blurred. - 86.138.87.64 18:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose low res -- Gorgo 16:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ACK Hein 17:32, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Such upright piano interior is usually dark and light absorbing, so I wouldn't mind the little bit of blur. This picture has a nice composition. Of course, if a higher resolution image is available, that would be much better.--Wing-Chi 00:24, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose depth of field not good. Unclear if Stock Exchange pictrues are truly free. Justinc 09:50, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. villy ♦✎ 17:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great picture, too low res. --Groucho 22:53, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral  → not featured Calderwood 07:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu